SStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access My library Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly · Study

Home/Academic integrity and plagiarism

Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

George C. Banks, Steven G. Rogelberg, Haley M. Woznyj, Ronald S. Landis, Deborah Elizabeth Rupp

2016-06-25editorialJournal of Business and Psychology176 citationsbronze

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Academic integrity and plagiarism Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 176 citations exist upstream.

References

2001Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective

1977Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

2002Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.

1979Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action

2015Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings

2019The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis

2015Promoting an open research culture

2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling

Cited by

2017Science’s reproducibility and replicability crisis: International business is not immune

2017Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists

2023History repeating: guidelines to address common problems in psychedelic science

2017HARKing: How Badly Can Cherry-Picking and Question Trolling Produce Bias in Published Results?

2023Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of p -hacking strategies

2025Reproducibility in machine‐learning‐based research: Overview, barriers, and drivers

2020Actionable recommendations for narrowing the science-practice gap in open science

2016A Call for Openness in Research Reporting: How to Turn Covert Practices Into Helpful Tools

Details

Year2016

Typeeditorial

VenueJournal of Business and Psychology

Languageen

Files0 public / 0

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7

openalex_workW2474130481

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.