Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The new history of psychology: Some (different) answers to Lovett’s five questions.

16 references·14 citing·30 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions35,276 cited
1930A History of Experimental Psychology1,808 cited
1994Psychology as the behaviorist views it.1,669 cited
1931The Whig interpretation of history1,238 cited
1937A History of Psychology in Autobiography857 cited
1968The historical background of modern social psychology586 cited
1930History of Experimental Psychology.578 cited
1950A history of experimental psychology, 2nd ed.484 cited
1991A history of modern psychology394 cited
1980The history of introspection reconsidered305 cited
1979The positivist repudiation of Wundt296 cited
1953The Go-Between276 cited
2010A History of Modern Psychology in Context249 cited
1965On the limits of ‘presentism’ and ‘historicism’ in the historiography of the behavioral sciences240 cited
1991PSYCHOLOGY IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY THOUGHT AND SOCIETY222 cited
1979The crisis of experimentalism in the 1920s: E. G. Boring and his uses of history.174 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

2017For balance in the historiography of psychology: Reply to Brock (2017).19 cited
2017Philosophical histories can be contextual without being sociological: Comment on Araujo’s historiography15 cited
2017The “new history of psychology” and the uses and abuses of dichotomies14 cited
2018The Early Years of Industrial and Organizational Psychology12 cited
2022Teaching a Course on the History of Behavior Analysis10 cited
2019Reevaluating the initial impact of John Broadus Watson on American psychology: The necessity of comparative parameters8 cited
2017On methodological pluralism, context, and misinterpretation in the historiography of psychology: A reply to Brock and Burman6 cited
2017Alternative path for the future or a return to the past? Araujo’s “philosophical” history of psychology5 cited
2017The ambiguous “new history of psychology”: New questions for Brock (2017).3 cited
2023Debate y diversidad en “Historia de la Psicología”: Un diagnóstico del estado actual3 cited
2019The psychologist's biographer: Writing lives in the history of psychology2 cited
2017The new history of psychology II: Some (different) answers to Watrin’s four questions.1 cited
2025Sielutieteestä psykologiaan - suomalaisen psykologiahistorian haasteita0 cited
2021Psychological Approach to the Study of the Original Peruvian Man0 cited