SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Philosophy of Evidence Law
0 references·16 citing·48 second hop
A Philosophy of Evidence Law (2008)A Philosophy of Evidence LawRational Belief in Lottery- and Preface-Situations (2021)Rational Belief in Lottery- a…Pragmatic encroachment and legal proof (2021)Pragmatic encroachment and le…Four Arguments for Denying that Lottery Beliefs Are Justified (2021)Four Arguments for Denying th…Relevance and risk: How the relevant alternatives framework models the epistemology of risk (2020)Relevance and risk: How the r…Knowledge Attributions and Lottery Cases: A Review and New Evidence (2020)Knowledge Attributions and Lo…Legal Probabilism: A Qualified Defence (2019)Legal Probabilism: A Qualifie…When Does Evidence Suffice for Conviction? (2017)When Does Evidence Suffice fo…Truth, knowledge, and the standard of proof in criminal law (2017)Truth, knowledge, and the sta…Determining the base rate for guilt (2017)Determining the base rate for…The Burdens of Proof (2016)The Burdens of ProofExpert Testimony, Law and Epistemic Authority (2016)Expert Testimony, Law and Epi…‘A new and more rigorous approach’ to expert evidence in England and Wales? (2015)‘A new and more rigorous appr…The Right to be Presumed Innocent (2013)The Right to be Presumed Inno…The epistemology of scientific evidence (2012)The epistemology of scientifi…The Cool Crucible: Forensic Science and the Frailty of the Criminal Trial (2012)The Cool Crucible: Forensic S…HACIA UN ESTÁNDAR DE PRUEBA CIVIL (2012)HACIA UN ESTÁNDAR DE PRUEBA C…Kant: The Metaphysics of Morals (1996)Force and Freedom (2009)4. The Metaphysics of Morals (2012)Justice In-Between (2022)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. (1964)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)An Argumentation Interface for Expert Opinion Evidence (2016)Enhancing evidence-based argumentation in a Mainland China middle school (2019)Mathematical Modelling in Biomedicine: A Primer for the Curious and the Skeptic (2021)Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change (1974)The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (2006)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Forensic science as “risky business”: identifying key risk factors in the forensic process from crime scene to court (2015)Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners (2016)Forensic science evidence: Naive estimates of false positive error rates and reliability (2019)Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action (1999)Testimony and Epistemic Autonomy (2006)Epistemic authority: a theory of trust, authority, and autonomy in belief (2013)Evidence in Norwegian child protection interventions – Analysing cases of familial violence (2022)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1994)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Can the Reasonable Doubt Standard be Justified? A Reconstructed Dialogue (2018)Imprecise Probability and the Measurement of Keynes's "Weight of Arguments" (2018)Philosophical Explanations. (1983)Knowledge and Its Limits (2000)Knowledge and its Limits (2002)Rehabilitating Statistical Evidence (2019)Knowledge and Legal Proof (2022)Idealization in Epistemology (2023)Epistemology and Cognition (1987)The Reasonable and the Relevant: Legal Standards of Proof (2019)Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. (1955)Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2015)Inference to the Best Explanation, Relative Plausibility, and Probability (2020)Recent work on the proof paradox (2020)The Philosophy of Legal Proof (2024)Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge (1976)Knowledge and Practical Interests (2005)Epistemic Injustice (2007)Belief, credence, and moral encroachment (2020)A Tale of Two Doctrines (2021)Does legal epistemology rest on a mistake? On fetishism, two‐tier system design, and conscientious fact‐finding (2021)An Essay concerning Human Understanding (1690)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957)The Modularity of Mind (1983)Against Knowledge Closure (2019)Knowledge as Justified True Belief (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2017When Does Evidence Suffice for Conviction?134 cited
  • 2017Truth, knowledge, and the standard of proof in criminal law95 cited
  • 2020Relevance and risk: How the relevant alternatives framework models the epistemology of risk59 cited
  • 2016The Burdens of Proof58 cited
  • 2021Four Arguments for Denying that Lottery Beliefs Are Justified56 cited
  • 2019Legal Probabilism: A Qualified Defence44 cited
  • 2012The epistemology of scientific evidence40 cited
  • 2012The Cool Crucible: Forensic Science and the Frailty of the Criminal Trial36 cited
  • 2016Expert Testimony, Law and Epistemic Authority31 cited
  • 2013The Right to be Presumed Innocent24 cited
  • 2012HACIA UN ESTÁNDAR DE PRUEBA CIVIL24 cited
  • 2021Pragmatic encroachment and legal proof23 cited
  • 2015‘A new and more rigorous approach’ to expert evidence in England and Wales?22 cited
  • 2017Determining the base rate for guilt22 cited
  • 2020Knowledge Attributions and Lottery Cases: A Review and New Evidence22 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2021
Rational Belief in Lottery- and Preface-Situations
21 cited