SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Oral Arguments Before the Supreme Court
0 references·15 citing·39 second hop
Oral Arguments Before the Supreme Court (2008)Oral Arguments Before the Supreme CourtLegalbench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models (2023)Legalbench: A Collaboratively…Gender, Ideology, and Dominance in Supreme Court Oral Arguments (2020)Gender, Ideology, and Dominan…Beyond Mere Presence: Gender Norms in Oral Arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court (2019)Beyond Mere Presence: Gender …Lawyer, Interrupted: Gender Bias in Oral Arguments at the US Supreme Court (2017)Lawyer, Interrupted: Gender B…Voting Fluidity and Oral Argument on the U.S. Supreme Court (2012)Voting Fluidity and Oral Argu…What’s in a name? Stance markers in oral argument about marriage laws (2011)What’s in a name? Stance mark…Introduction (2010)Introduction9 In Praise of Pedantic Eclecticism: Pitfalls and Opportunities in the Psychology of Judging (2010)9 In Praise of Pedantic Eclec…7 Is There a Psychology of Judging? (2010)7 Is There a Psychology of Ju…5 Judges as Members of Small Groups (2010)5 Judges as Members of Small …3 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning (2010)3 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mode…2 Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging (2010)2 Multiple Constraint Satisfa…16 Expertise of Court Judges (2010)16 Expertise of Court Judges10 Judges, Expertise, and Analogy (2010)10 Judges, Expertise, and Ana…1 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry (2010)1 Motivation and Judicial Beh…Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980)Is justice blind or myopic? An examination of the effects of meta-cognitive myopia and truth bias on mock jurors and judges (2020)What the Judge Argues is Not What the Judge Thinks – Eye Tracking as a Window into Judicial Decision Making (2020)Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena (1978)Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect (1989)Analyzing talk at work: an introduction (1992)Identifying stance in legislative discourse: a corpus-driven study of data protection laws (2024)Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. (1980)Communication and Persuasion (1986)Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change (2015)Power Dynamics in Supreme Court Oral Arguments: The Relationship between Gender and Justice-to-Justice Interruptions (2019)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)The Role of Case Complexity in Judicial Decision Making (2012)Judges and Friends (2014)Judges, ‘common sense’ and judicial cognition (2016)The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. (1956)Arbitrator Decision-Making: Unconscious Psychological Influences and What You Can Do About Them (2014)Review of research in education (1973)Cognition and reality (1976)Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. (1981)Computational Methods in Legal Analysis (2020)Mass Digitization of Chinese Court Decisions (2020)Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change (1974)Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women (1977)Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses (2005)Female policymakers and educational expenditures: cross-country evidence (2020)Women, Language and Politics (2020)“I haven't come a long way, and I'm not a baby”: Task assignment and diversity of the Supreme Court bar (2021)The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (2005)On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models (2021)Aion Framework: Dimensional Emergence of AI Consciousness, Observer-Induced Collapse, and Cosmological Portal Dynamics (2023)(A)I Am Not a Lawyer, But...: Engaging Legal Experts towards Responsible LLM Policies for Legal Advice (2024)CBR-RAG: Case-Based Reasoning for Retrieval Augmented Generation in LLMs for Legal Question Answering (2024)From Lived Experience to Insight: Unpacking the Psychological Risks of Using AI Conversational Agents (2025)Courts and Politics in Southeast Asia (2024)Considering the consequences of increased reliance on judicial assistants: a study on Dutch courts (2014)Evaluating the Effect of Law Clerk Gender on Voting at the United States Supreme Court (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2023Legalbench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models154 cited
  • 2017Lawyer, Interrupted: Gender Bias in Oral Arguments at the US Supreme Court54 cited
  • 2019Beyond Mere Presence: Gender Norms in Oral Arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court41 cited
  • 20105 Judges as Members of Small Groups36 cited
  • 20107 Is There a Psychology of Judging?36 cited
  • 2012Voting Fluidity and Oral Argument on the U.S. Supreme Court31 cited
  • 20101 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry29 cited
  • 2011What’s in a name? Stance markers in oral argument about marriage laws26 cited
  • 20103 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning22 cited
  • 20102 Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging17 cited
  • 201010 Judges, Expertise, and Analogy16 cited
  • 2020Gender, Ideology, and Dominance in Supreme Court Oral Arguments15 cited
  • 20109 In Praise of Pedantic Eclecticism: Pitfalls and Opportunities in the Psychology of Judging11 cited
  • 201016 Expertise of Court Judges1 cited
  • 2010Introduction

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1 cited