SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals
0 references·16 citing·60 second hopsampled
Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals (2007)Peer Review and Manuscript Management in …Balancing AI and academic integrity: what are the positions of academic publishers and universities? (2024)Balancing AI and academic int…Citizen Science: Is It Good Science? (2023)Citizen Science: Is It Good S…Exploratory Research (2020)Exploratory ResearchEditorial board interlocking in knowledge management and intellectual capital research field (2018)Editorial board interlocking …Assessing the quality of feedback in the peer-review process (2015)Assessing the quality of feed…Research Misconduct—Definitions, Manifestations and Extent (2013)Research Misconduct—Definitio…Ethical Conduct in Chemical Research and Publishing (2013)Ethical Conduct in Chemical R…Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals (2012)Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged…Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Impact factor: outdated artef…A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating the Predictive Validity of Editorial Decisions: Do the Editors of a High Profile Journal Select Manuscripts that are Highly Cited After Publication? (2011)A Multilevel Modelling Approa…Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors (2010)Quality and Peer Review of Re…Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? A study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2010)Is interactive open access pu…Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research (2009)Quality of manuscript reviews…An Author's Guide to Publication Ethics: A Review of Emerging Standards in Biomedical Journals (2009)An Author's Guide to Publicat…A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ? (2009)A content analysis of referee…Successful Authors and Effective Reviewers (2008)Successful Authors and Effect…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach (2012)How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects (2013)Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game (2016)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Descriptions of Sampling Practices Within Five Approaches to Qualitative Research in Education and the Health Sciences (2014)The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power (2014)Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers (2019)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. (1971)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Reviewing the review process: Identifying sources of delay (2012)Motivations for performing scholarly prepublication peer review: A scoping review (2020)Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Report Guideline Development (2013)Ítems de referencia para publicar Protocolos de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: Declaración PRISMA-P 2015 (2016)Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research (2019)When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)Importance of Transparent Reporting of Health Research (2014)Biomedical authors’ awareness of publication ethics: an international survey (2018)Duplicate and salami publication: a prevalence study of journal policies (2019)Public Knowledge: An essay Concerning the Social Dimension of Science (1969)Editorial peer review : its strengths and weaknesses (2001)What Causes a Management Article to be Cited—Article, Author, or Journal? (2007)Citation gamesmanship: testing for evidence of ego bias in peer review (2012)What We Still Don't Know About Peer Review (2016)Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (2017)Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. (2004)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Citation rates in mathematics: a study of variation by subdiscipline (2012)Citation score normalized by cited references (CSNCR): The introduction of a new citation impact indicator (2016)Citation score normalized by cited references (CSNCR): The introduction of a new citation impact indicator (2016)The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (1968)Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning (1991)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)Product destruction: Exploring unsustainable production-consumption systems and appropriate policy responses (2022)A framework for enhancing the replicability of behavioral MIS research using prediction oriented techniques (2024)The Build Back Circular Framework: Circular Economy Strategies for Post-Disaster Reconstruction and Recovery (2025)An Analysis of Citizen Science Based Research: Usage and Publication Patterns (2015)Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? (2015)What Is Citizen Science? – A Scientometric Meta-Analysis (2016)Co to jest citizen science? (2024)How to close the loop with citizen scientists to advance meaningful science (2024)Why is it so hard to do co-created citizen social science? Reflecting on challenges and potential solutions (2026)Towards Intelligent Regulation of Artificial Intelligence (2019)Beyond bias and discrimination: redefining the AI ethics principle of fairness in healthcare machine-learning algorithms (2022)Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance (2023)ChatGPT in Academia: University Students’ Attitudes Towards the use of ChatGPT and Plagiarism (2025)Redefining student assessment in AI-infused learning environments: a systematic review of challenges and strategies for academic integrity (2025)The ethics of erroneous AI-generated scientific figures (2025)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2020Exploratory Research397 cited
  • 2011Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?370 cited
  • 2012Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals200 cited
  • 2011A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating the Predictive Validity of Editorial Decisions: Do the Editors of a High Profile Journal Select Manuscripts that are Highly Cited After Publication?82 cited
  • 2010Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors73 cited
  • 2009An Author's Guide to Publication Ethics: A Review of Emerging Standards in Biomedical Journals62 cited
  • 2024Balancing AI and academic integrity: what are the positions of academic publishers and universities?53 cited
  • 2023Citizen Science: Is It Good Science?52 cited
  • 2009A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?47 cited
  • 2010Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? A study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes39 cited
  • 2009Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research36 cited
  • 2013Research Misconduct—Definitions, Manifestations and Extent36 cited
  • 2008

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Successful Authors and Effective Reviewers
34 cited
  • 2018Editorial board interlocking in knowledge management and intellectual capital research field24 cited
  • 2013Ethical Conduct in Chemical Research and Publishing24 cited
  • 2015Assessing the quality of feedback in the peer-review process23 cited