Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Street-Level Bureaucrats as Individual Policymakers: The Relationship between Attitudes and Coping Behavior toward Vulnerable Children and Youth

16 references·16 citing·46 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2003Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.81,863 cited
1981Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services8,971 cited
2006Method Variance in Organizational Research3,440 cited
1993Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy2,664 cited
2010What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research2,401 cited
1967Inside Bureaucracy2,114 cited
1984The New Economics of Organization1,972 cited
2005Identity and the Economics of Organizations1,684 cited
1981Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services1,576 cited
2005A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Counterproductive Work Behavior.1,462 cited
1979Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions1,211 cited
2003Cops, Teachers, Counselors1,161 cited
2011Disciplining the Poor1,129 cited
1996Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring.924 cited
2014Common Method Bias in Public Management Studies

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

836 cited

1994Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting.817 cited

Cited by

2020Playing defence: the impact of trust on the coping mechanisms of street-level bureaucrats97 cited
2019Supervisory Leadership at the Frontlines: Street-Level Discretion, Supervisor Influence, and Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Attitude Towards Clients89 cited
2021Street‐level bureaucrats and policy entrepreneurship: When implementers challenge policy design87 cited
2020Deliberation and Deliberative Organizational Routines in Frontline Decision-Making63 cited
2020Distinguishing the street‐level policy entrepreneur58 cited
2018Understanding street-level bureaucrats’ attitude towards clients: Towards a measurement instrument52 cited
2021Behavioural governance in the policy process: introduction to the special issue43 cited
2024Designing policies that could work: understanding the interaction between policy design spaces and organizational responses in public sector40 cited
2021Walking the Talk of Social Equity? Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Decisionmaking About the Provision of Personal Resources36 cited
2019Clients’ Help Deservingness, Crowd Situational Stress And Discretionary Decision-making: An Experimental Study Of Regulatory Street-level Bureaucrats In China35 cited
2020Against the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analyzing Role Changes of Healthcare Street-Level Bureaucrats in Mexico28 cited
2022Individual Agency in Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Implementation of Policy Reforms: The Role of Their Policy Evaluation and Self-efficacy26 cited
2020Impacts of policy changes on Care-Leaving Workers in a time of coronavirus: Comparative analysis of discretion and constraints25 cited
2022Cream‐skimming at the frontline: The role of administrative literacy24 cited
2018Unlearning and public services —A case study with a Vygotskian approach24 cited
2020Coping with tensions between standardization and individualization in social assistance23 cited