Improving Performance in Case Courses: An Argument for Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales

Faye S. McIntyre · Faye W. Gilbert

10 citations0/0 files storedMarketing Education Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Management and Marketing Education Student Assessment and Feedback Evaluation of Teaching Practices

Abstract

The authors describe the development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale as a means of evaluation that provides students and guidance for improving performance in case courses.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

References

1954The critical incident technique.2007Critical Incident Technique 1986Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations.1986Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations 1980Supervisor's responses to subordinate poor performance: A test of an attributional model 1991INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AS A CONTEXT FOR THE EFFECTS OF APPRAISAL INTERVIEWS ON PERFORMANCE AND SATISFACTION: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY.1975BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 1975BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE.

Cited by

2015Fifty Years and Going Strong: What Makes Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales So Perennial as an Appraisal Method?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.