The Case for Teachers’ Classroom English Proficiency

Donald J. Freeman

74 citations0/0 files storedRELC Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Multilingual Education and Policy Second Language Learning and Teaching

Abstract

New conceptualizations of English are challenging traditional norms of what the language is, as well as how it is taught and by whom. These changes, coupled with the expansion of teaching English across the educational spectrum from younger grades to tertiary levels, present challenges to many national education systems. The role of teachers’ English competence, particularly in public-sector teaching, is central to how these educational changes play out in countries around the world. How classroom English language ability is described connects to many dimensions of teaching. This article argues that conventional definitions that connect general English proficiency, often based on generic statements about language use, do not address the type of classroom language teachers need in order to teach. Further, language training focused on general language fluency often does not directly address teachers’ particular professional needs. Policies and practices based on these definitions disadvantage most English language teachers by defining problems of teaching quality in terms of deficits in general English proficiency. English-for-Teaching, a conceptualization of the English teachers’ use in classroom language teaching, is based on a languages for specific purposes (LSP) methodology. The construct defines three functional areas of classroom language use – managing the classroom, understanding and communicating lesson content, and assessing and giving students feedback. The article outlines the construct and a professional development programme based on it. Analyses from implementing these programmes provided by ministries of education to pre- and in-service teachers in Japan and in Vietnam are discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 74 citations exist upstream.

References

1987Knowledge and Teaching:Foundations of the New Reform 2008Content Knowledge for Teaching 2017Course in General Linguistics 1993Linguistic Imperialism 2013Course in General Linguistics 1987English for Specific Purposes 1995The Other Tongue: English across Cultures 1994The other tongue: English across cultures. 2nd edn. Ed. by Braj B. Kachru Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press. 1992. Pp. xxv, 384. Cloth $44.95, paper $19.95.

Cited by

2019Connecting language proficiency to teaching ability: A meta-analysis 2017‘A2 is Normal’ – Thai Secondary School English Teachers’ Encounters with the CEFR 2018Remapping the teacher knowledge-base of language teacher education: A Vietnamese perspective 2019Neither Fish nor Fowl: the Contested Identity of Teachers of English in an EFL Context 2019Identity of foreign language pre-service teachers to speakers of other languages: Insights from Brazil and Chile 2017

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.