Reasons for Plagiarism in Higher Education

Polona Šprajc · Marko Urh · Janja Jerebic · Dragan Trivan · Eva Jereb

136 citations0/0 files storedOrganizacija

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic integrity and plagiarism Ethics in Business and Education Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

Abstract

Abstract Background and Purpose: The survey was performed to determine the reasons that lead students to possibly commit plagiarism during their studies. By doing so, we wanted to determine the main reason for the appearance of plagiarism and how, within this main reasons, various indicators of plagiarism are judged and, finally, how demographic data and student motivation for study are associated with the reasons for plagiarism. Design/Methodology/Approach: A paper-and-pencil survey was carried out among 17 faculties of the University of Maribor in Slovenia. A sample of 139 students 85 males and 54 females participated in this study, ages ranged from 19 to 36 years. The questionnaire contained 95 closed questions referring to: (i) general data, (ii) education, (iii) social status, (iv) awareness of plagiarism, and (v) reasons for plagiarism. Parametric and nonparametric statistical tests were performed depending on distributions of the answers. Results: The results reveal that information and communication technology is largely responsible for the plagiarism with two reasons highlighted: ease of copying and ease of access to materials and new technologies. We also found some differences between low and high motivated students. Different average values of the answers considering motivation for study were confirmed for academic skills, teaching factors and other reasons for plagiarism, where the average for lower motivated students is significantly different (higher) than the average for higher motivated students. At the end we could find no direct relationship between the average time spent on the Internet and plagiarism. Conclusion: The transmission of knowledge is the basic mission of faculties. This mission is based on moral beliefs about the harmfulness of its abuse, and plagiarism is exactly such abuse. Regardless of the students past at this point professors are those who could greatly contribute to the right set of skills to keep students off plagiarising.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 136 citations exist upstream.

References

2000Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.2002Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview 1996Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings 1998Caught in the Net: How to Recognize the Signs of Internet Addiction--and a Winning Strategy for Recovery 1989Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors 2005Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective 2010Identifying and profiling scholastic cheaters: Their personality, cognitive ability, and motivation.2008Situational and Personal Causes of Student Cheating

Cited by

2017Gender differences and the awareness of plagiarism in higher education 2019Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct A Systematic Review 2024Interplay of rationality and morality in using ChatGPT for academic misconduct 2020Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Plagiarism as Reported by Participants Completing the AuthorAID MOOC on Research Writing 2019Impact of pressure, self-efficacy, and self-competency on students’ plagiarism in higher education

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.