SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Association between trial registration and positive study findings: cross sectional study (Epidemiological Study of Randomized Trials—ESORT)
10 references·14 citing·44 second hop
Association between trial registration and positive study findings: cross sectional study (Epidemiological Study of Randomized Trials—ESORT) (2017)Association between trial registration an…Make journals report clinical trials properly (2016)Make journals report clinical…Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study (2016)Association between trial reg…Searching ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to inform systematic reviews: what are the optimal search approaches? (2014)Searching ClinicalTrials.gov …Reporting of Results in ClinicalTrials.gov and High-Impact Journals (2014)Reporting of Results in Clini…Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials (2012)Influence of Reported Study D…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Comparison of Registered and …Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Identifying outcome reporting…Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2004)Clinical trial registration: …Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Development of a highly sensi…Systematic scoping review of cluster randomised trials conducted exclusively in low-income and middle-income countries between 2017 and 2022 (2024)Systematic scoping review of …Supporting study registration to reduce research waste (2024)Supporting study registration…Influence of lack of blinding on the estimation of medication-related harms: a retrospective cohort study of randomized controlled trials (2024)Influence of lack of blinding…Improving the transparency and reliability of observational studies through registration (2024)Improving the transparency an…A systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies to promote vaccination uptake (2024)A systematic review and meta-…Design and Conduct of Randomized Clinical Trials Evaluating Surgical Innovations in Ophthalmology: A Systematic Review (2022)Design and Conduct of Randomi…Reporting quality of trial protocols improved for non-regulated interventions but not regulated interventions: A repeated cross-sectional study (2021)Reporting quality of trial pr…Registration of health and medical research (2021)Registration of health and me…Rationale and design of repeated cross-sectional studies to evaluate the reporting quality of trial protocols: the Adherence to SPIrit REcommendations (ASPIRE) study and associated projects (2020)Rationale and design of repea…No evidence found for an association between trial characteristics and treatment effects in randomized trials of testosterone therapy in men: a meta-epidemiological study (2020)No evidence found for an asso…Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (2020)Impact of a short version of …Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture (2019)Trial registration as a safeg…Registered trials report less beneficial treatment effects than unregistered ones: a meta-epidemiological study in orthodontics (2018)Registered trials report less…Evaluating the Completeness of ClinicalTrials.gov (2018)Evaluating the Completeness o…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods (2014)From Mexico to Mali: four years in the history of clinical trial registration (2009)The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials (2011)Evaluating adherence to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' policy of mandatory, timely clinical trial registration (2013)Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review (2017)Systematic review identifies six metrics and one method for assessing literature search effectiveness but no consensus on appropriate use (2018)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. (2011)The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)Exploratory Research (2020)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues (2002)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents (2015)Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Chronic Pain (2016)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (2006)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Predicting Violent Behavior: What Can Neuroscience Add? (2017)Avoidable waste of research related to outcome planning and reporting in clinical trials (2018)Study Preregistration: An Evaluation of a Method for Transparent Reporting (2020)Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1) (2005)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (Chinese version) (2010)Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)Compliance with prospective trial registration guidance remained low in high-impact journals and has implications for primary end point reporting (2016)Consistency of trial reporting between ClinicalTrials.gov and corresponding publications: one decade after FDAAA (2020)Should research misconduct be criminalized? (2020)Prevention of selective outcome reporting: let us start from the beginning (2016)Outcome reporting recommendations for clinical trial protocols and reports: a scoping review (2020)Multi-Studies: A Novel Approach to Addressing Irreplicability in RCTs (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2012Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials1,047 cited
  • 2002Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed833 cited
  • 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
  • 2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
  • 2004Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors408 cited
  • 2014Reporting of Results in ClinicalTrials.gov and High-Impact Journals100 cited
  • 2016Make journals report clinical trials properly93 cited
  • 2014Searching ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to inform systematic reviews: what are the optimal search approaches?75 cited
  • 2016Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study72 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Evaluating the Completeness of ClinicalTrials.gov48 cited
  • 2024A systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies to promote vaccination uptake46 cited
  • 2024Improving the transparency and reliability of observational studies through registration

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

34 cited
  • 2018Registered trials report less beneficial treatment effects than unregistered ones: a meta-epidemiological study in orthodontics34 cited
  • 2020Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial34 cited
  • 2019Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture29 cited
  • 2020No evidence found for an association between trial characteristics and treatment effects in randomized trials of testosterone therapy in men: a meta-epidemiological study24 cited
  • 2021Registration of health and medical research23 cited
  • 2020Rationale and design of repeated cross-sectional studies to evaluate the reporting quality of trial protocols: the Adherence to SPIrit REcommendations (ASPIRE) study and associated projects15 cited
  • 2024Influence of lack of blinding on the estimation of medication-related harms: a retrospective cohort study of randomized controlled trials14 cited
  • 2022Design and Conduct of Randomized Clinical Trials Evaluating Surgical Innovations in Ophthalmology: A Systematic Review13 cited
  • 2021Reporting quality of trial protocols improved for non-regulated interventions but not regulated interventions: A repeated cross-sectional study11 cited
  • 2024Systematic scoping review of cluster randomised trials conducted exclusively in low-income and middle-income countries between 2017 and 202210 cited
  • 2024Supporting study registration to reduce research waste7 cited