SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A review of routinely collected data studies in urology: Methodological considerations, reporting quality, and future directions
13 references·0 citing·42 second hop
A review of routinely collected data studies in urology: Methodological considerations, reporting quality, and future directions (2017)A review of routinely collected data stud…Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Two new Later Stone Age sites…The REporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Health Data (RECORD) Statement: Methods for Arriving at Consensus and Developing Reporting Guidelines (2015)The REporting of Studies Cond…The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement (2015)The REporting of studies Cond…Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials (2014)Healthcare outcomes assessed …Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study (2011)Uses and misuses of the STROB…Registration of observational studies: Is it time? (2010)Registration of observational…Registration of observational studies (2010)Registration of observational…Development and use of reporting guidelines for assessing the quality of validation studies of health administrative data (2010)Development and use of report…Ten steps towards improving prognosis research (2009)Ten steps towards improving p…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Data Cleaning: Detecting, Diagnosing, and Editing Data Abnormalities (2005)Data Cleaning: Detecting, Dia…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely collected health data statement for pharmacoepidemiology (RECORD-PE) (2018)Long-term Cognitive, Psychological, and Health Outcomes Associated With Child Abuse and Neglect (2020)A product perspective on total data quality management (1998)Identifying Objective Physiological Markers and Modifiable Behaviors for Self-Reported Stress and Mental Health Status Using Wearable Sensors and Mobile Phones: Observational Study (2018)Politics, sentiments, and misinformation: An analysis of the Twitter discussion on the 2016 Austrian Presidential Elections (2018)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Academic Interventions for Elementary and Middle School Students With Low Socioeconomic Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2017)The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures (2018)Challenges in meta-analyses with observational studies (2020)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Suicide among physicians and health-care workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration (2021)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Using Mendelian Randomization (2021)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force (2022)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) (2007)The Influence of the Therapist-Patient Relationship on Treatment Outcome in Physical Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review (2010)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology (1989)Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives (1999)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2024Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal24,064 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies23,532 cited
  • 2015The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement5,833 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials4,099 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement1,993 cited
  • 2014Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials535 cited
  • 2005Data Cleaning: Detecting, Diagnosing, and Editing Data Abnormalities446 cited
  • 2010Development and use of reporting guidelines for assessing the quality of validation studies of health administrative data367 cited
  • 2011Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study290 cited
  • 2015The REporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Health Data (RECORD) Statement: Methods for Arriving at Consensus and Developing Reporting Guidelines222 cited
  • 2009Ten steps towards improving prognosis research161 cited
  • 2010Registration of observational studies: Is it time?152 cited
  • 2010Registration of observational studies131 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.