References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 2017Lawyer, Interrupted: Gender Bias in Oral Arguments at the US Supreme Court54 cited
• 20105 Judges as Members of Small Groups36 cited
• 20107 Is There a Psychology of Judging?36 cited
• 2012Voting Fluidity and Oral Argument on the U.S. Supreme Court31 cited
• 20101 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry29 cited
• 2014Entrainment, dominance and alliance in supreme court hearings28 cited
• 2019Power Dynamics in Supreme Court Oral Arguments: The Relationship between Gender and Justice-to-Justice Interruptions27 cited
• 2011What’s in a name? Stance markers in oral argument about marriage laws26 cited
• 20103 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning22 cited
• 2012Entrainment in spontaneous speech: The case of filled pauses in Supreme Court hearings22 cited
• 20102 Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging17 cited
• 201010 Judges, Expertise, and Analogy16 cited
• 2020Gender, Ideology, and Dominance in Supreme Court Oral Arguments15 cited
• 20109 In Praise of Pedantic Eclecticism: Pitfalls and Opportunities in the Psychology of Judging11 cited
• 2010