Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Systematic review: Outcome reporting bias is a problem in high impact factor neurology journals

11 references·8 citing·53 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
2014Extent of Non-Publication in Cohorts of Studies Approved by Research Ethics Committees or Included in Trial Registries269 cited
2015Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review237 cited
2015Innovations in Data Collection, Management, and Archiving for Systematic Reviews117 cited
2013Declaration of transparency for each research article90 cited
2013Use of Trial Register Information during the Peer Review Process71 cited
2012Prospective Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Eczema Treatments: A Systematic Review60 cited
2012Quality of Registration for Clinical Trials Published in Emergency Medicine Journals48 cited

Cited by

2023Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses33 cited
2020Reproducible and transparent research practices in published neurology research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

25 cited

2019Using the CONSORT statement to evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised trials: a cross-sectional review25 cited

2019Evaluation of selective outcome reporting and trial registration practices among addiction clinical trials24 cited

2021Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses18 cited

2023Assessment of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment in Orthopaedics: A Cross-sectional Analysis17 cited

2020Assessment of transparent and reproducible research practices in the psychiatry literature16 cited

2021Registry versus publication: discrepancy of primary outcomes and possible outcome reporting bias in child and adolescent mental health14 cited