Is the Utility of Secondary Coping a Function of Ethnicity or the Context of Reception? A Longitudinal Study Across Western and Eastern Cultures

Ágnes Szabó · Alexander Scott English · Paul E. Jose · Colleen A. Ward · MA Jian-hong

32 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

International Student and Expatriate Challenges Student Stress and Coping Racial and Ethnic Identity Research

Abstract

Although cross-cultural research suggests that the development and functionality of secondary coping strategies are substantially influenced by the broader cultural context, research findings are not completely conclusive. Some studies indicate that secondary coping is more adaptive for Asian participants compared with Westerners, while others emphasize the adaptability of the coping style in Asian, but not Western, contexts. The main objective of the present study was to systematically test for ethnic and contextual differences in the effectiveness of secondary strategies (measured in the form of acceptance and positive reinterpretation) in reducing the negative effects of acculturative stress on somatic symptoms with samples of international students. A 3-month longitudinal study was conducted in two different contexts: (a) Asian and Western international students in China (Asians: n = 53, Westerners: n = 51) and (b) similar groups in New Zealand (Asians: n = 61, Westerners: n = 65). The data were subjected to a hierarchical regression analysis with changes in psychological symptoms functioning as the dependent variable. Findings indicated that stress, secondary coping, and cultural context significantly interacted in predicting changes in somatic symptoms. Specifically, secondary coping exacerbated the negative effects of acculturative stress on psychological adjustment in New Zealand. In contrast, secondary coping functioned as a buffer in China, such that it was effective at reducing the negative impact of stress over time. Findings indicated that ethnicity did not significantly moderate the stress–coping–adjustment relationship. Our results show that the effectiveness of secondary coping varies as a function of the cultural context.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 32 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives 1985Stress, appraisal, and coping 2002Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance 1989Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.2014Large-Scale Psychological Differences Within China Explained by Rice Versus Wheat Agriculture 2006On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness.2004Culture and Social Support: Who Seeks It and Why?2006Stress perspectives on acculturation

Cited by

2018The relationships between religiosity, stress, and mental health for Muslim immigrant youth 2022The ‘Myth of Zero-COVID’ Nation: A Digital Ethnography of Expats’ Survival Amid Shanghai Lockdown during the Omicron Variant Outbreak 2020Crossing the rice-wheat border: Not all intra-cultural adaptation is equal 2023Acculturation and linguistic ideology in the context of global student mobility: a cross-cultural ethnography of anglophone international students in China 2023Cross-cultural adaptation for international nursing students from the Belt and Road Initiative in China: A follow-up survey study

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.