Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Effect of Urgency of Take-Over Requests During Highly Automated Driving Under Distraction Conditions

11 references·16 citing·48 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1997Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse4,525 cited
1999Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task1,087 cited
2013“Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?775 cited
2008A Comparison of Tactile, Visual, and Auditory Warnings for Rear-End Collision Prevention in Simulated Driving355 cited
2004Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): implications for preventive strategies340 cited
2011Towards a dynamic balance between humans and automation: authority, ability, responsibility and control in shared and cooperative control situations322 cited
2004Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems310 cited
1997Alarm effectiveness in driver-centred collision-warning systems205 cited
1996From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: Safety implications of automation in vehicles202 cited
2003Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving200 cited
2007The influence of distraction and driving context on driver response to imperfect collision warning systems193 cited

Cited by

2018Take-over requests in highly automated driving: A crowdsourcing survey on auditory, vibrotactile, and visual displays184 cited
2018The effects of takeover request modalities on highly automated car control transitions169 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2016Assisting Drivers with Ambient Take-Over Requests in Highly Automated Driving155 cited

2020Automated Driving: A Literature Review of the Take over Request in Conditional Automation154 cited

2016Secondary task engagement and vehicle automation – Comparing the effects of different automation levels in an on-road experiment149 cited

2015Keep the driver in control: Automating automobiles of the future147 cited

2018From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance145 cited

2018Non-driving-related tasks, workload, and takeover performance in highly automated driving contexts145 cited

2017Driver compliance to take-over requests with different auditory outputs in conditional automation143 cited

2020Predicting driver takeover performance in conditionally automated driving142 cited

2017Coming back into the loop: Drivers’ perceptual-motor performance in critical events after automated driving138 cited

2018Transitioning to manual driving requires additional time after automation deactivation134 cited

2017Why is steering not the same as braking? The impact of non-driving related tasks on lateral and longitudinal driver interventions during conditionally automated driving132 cited

2020Multimodal warning design for take-over request in conditionally automated driving129 cited

2017From Car-Driver-Handovers to Cooperative Interfaces: Visions for Driver–Vehicle Interaction in Automated Driving123 cited

2018Rolling Out the Red (and Green) Carpet: Supporting Driver Decision Making in Automation-to-Manual Transitions122 cited