Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Unique, but still best practice? The Research Excellence Framework (REF) from an international perspective

12 references·16 citing·46 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
2011Performance-based university research funding systems1,017 cited
2003University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison635 cited
2015The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management610 cited
2015Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review466 cited
2013Constitutive Effects of Performance Indicators: Getting beyond unintended consequences216 cited
2015How incentives trickle down: Local use of a national bibliometric indicator system142 cited
2015Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: The case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator134 cited
2012The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science--a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005-9)133 cited
2009An Outline of the Bibliometric Indicator Used for Performance-Based Funding of Research Institutions in Norway107 cited
2015Research assessment in the UK and Italy: Costly and difficult, but probably worth it (at least for a while)102 cited
2016Research Performance Based Funding Systems: a Comparative Assessment96 cited

Cited by

2018The Norwegian Model in Norway80 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2018

Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities?

78 cited

2020The New Research Assessment Reform in China and Its Implementation77 cited

2020Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda75 cited

2024Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality?68 cited

2020What constitutes high quality higher education pedagogical research?68 cited

2020Bibliometrics in Academic Recruitment: A Screening Tool Rather than a Game Changer66 cited

2020Professional standards in bibliometric research evaluation? A meta-evaluation of European assessment practice 2005–201965 cited

2020National Lists of Scholarly Publication Channels: An Overview and Recommendations for Their Construction and Maintenance62 cited

2020Science as collaborative knowledge generation57 cited

2021Assessing research excellence: Evaluating the Research Excellence Framework57 cited

2022Assessing the Impact of the UK’s Research Excellence Framework on the Relationship between University Scholarly Output and Education and Regional Economic Growth55 cited

2024Evaluating research quality with Large Language Models: An analysis of ChatGPT’s effectiveness with different settings and inputs47 cited

2020The role of metrics in peer assessments45 cited

2018Academic communities37 cited

2023Performance-based research funding: Evidence from the largest natural experiment worldwide37 cited