SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Orthopaedic Surgery Journals
16 references·16 citing·46 second hopsampled
An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Orthopaedic Surgery Journals (2018)An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and…Impact of the mandatory implementation of reporting guidelines on reporting quality in a surgical journal: A before and after study (2016)Impact of the mandatory imple…A systematic review of trial registration and selective outcome reporting in psychotherapy randomized controlled trials (2016)A systematic review of trial …Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration (2015)Is Mandatory Prospective Tria…Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials (2014)Evidence for the Selective Re…Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions (2014)Bias due to selective inclusi…Registration Rates, Adequacy of Registration, and a Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Surgery Journals (2013)Registration Rates, Adequacy …Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Comparison of Registered and …Quality of Prospective Controlled Randomized Trials (2007)Quality of Prospective Contro…Standards of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Surgery (2006)Standards of Reporting of Ran…Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? (2006)Does a "Level I Evidence" rat…Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Value of Flow Diagrams in Rep…Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)Reported Methodologic Quality…Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies (2001)Comparison of Evidence of Tre…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials (1998)The unpredictability paradox:…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasThe endorsement of general and artificial intelligence reporting guidelines in radiological journals: a meta-research study (2023)The endorsement of general an…Registration and primary outcome reporting in behavioral health trials (2022)Registration and primary outc…Harms-related data are poorly reported among randomized controlled trials underpinning the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline recommendations for rotator cuff injuries (2022)Harms-related data are poorly…Assessing journal author guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: findings from an institutional sample (2022)Assessing journal author guid…Intervention Reporting of Published Trials Is Insufficient in Orthopaedic Surgery Journals: Application of the Template for Intervention Description and Replication Checklist (2021)Intervention Reporting of Pub…Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of orthopedic trauma literature: A cross-sectional review (2021)Evaluation of spin in the abs…Clinical Trial Registry Use in Orthopaedic Surgery Systematic Reviews (2021)Clinical Trial Registry Use i…Poor compliance of clinical trial registration among trials included in systematic reviews: a cohort study (2020)Poor compliance of clinical t…Intervention reporting of clinical trials published in high-impact cardiology journals: effect of the TIDieR checklist and guide (2020)Intervention reporting of cli…Biomedical conferences’ author instructions rarely mention guidelines for reporting abstracts of trials and systematic reviews (2020)Biomedical conferences’ autho…Analyzing Spin in Abstracts of Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Insignificant Primary Endpoints (2020)Analyzing Spin in Abstracts o…Using the CONSORT statement to evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised trials: a cross-sectional review (2019)Using the CONSORT statement t…Evaluation of selective outcome reporting and trial registration practices among addiction clinical trials (2019)Evaluation of selective outco…Endorsement of reporting guidelines and study registration by endocrine and internal medicine journals: meta-epidemiological study (2019)Endorsement of reporting guid…An Evaluation of Spin in Lower Extremity Joint Trials (2019)An Evaluation of Spin in Lowe…An Evaluation of Publication Bias in High-Impact Orthopaedic Literature (2019)An Evaluation of Publication …Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review (2011)Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research (2019)A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why (2020)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)What Can Police Do to Reduce Crime, Disorder, and Fear? (2004)The Principles of Effective Correctional Treatment Also Apply To Sexual Offenders (2009)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. (2011)The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)Exploratory Research (2020)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)Multiple outcomes and analyses in clinical trials create challenges for interpretation and research synthesis (2017)Collecting data (2019)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)CONSORT Revised—Improving the Reporting of Randomized Trials (2001)A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder (2004)The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study (2009)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Appraising the Quality of Medical Education Research Methods (2015)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Core outcome sets and systematic reviews (2016)Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors (2016)Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2017)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 2001Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses2,285 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 2001Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies919 cited
  • 1998The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials769 cited
  • 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
  • 2001Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials316 cited
  • 2014Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions281 cited
  • 2014Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials187 cited
  • 2006Standards of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Surgery161 cited
  • 2007Quality of Prospective Controlled Randomized Trials121 cited
  • 2015Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration99 cited
  • 2006Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

99 cited
  • 2016Impact of the mandatory implementation of reporting guidelines on reporting quality in a surgical journal: A before and after study98 cited
  • 2013Registration Rates, Adequacy of Registration, and a Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Surgery Journals92 cited
  • 2016A systematic review of trial registration and selective outcome reporting in psychotherapy randomized controlled trials92 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019An Evaluation of Spin in Lower Extremity Joint Trials37 cited
    • 2020Analyzing Spin in Abstracts of Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Insignificant Primary Endpoints37 cited
    • 2019An Evaluation of Publication Bias in High-Impact Orthopaedic Literature26 cited
    • 2019Using the CONSORT statement to evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised trials: a cross-sectional review25 cited
    • 2019Evaluation of selective outcome reporting and trial registration practices among addiction clinical trials24 cited
    • 2020Intervention reporting of clinical trials published in high-impact cardiology journals: effect of the TIDieR checklist and guide22 cited
    • 2021Intervention Reporting of Published Trials Is Insufficient in Orthopaedic Surgery Journals: Application of the Template for Intervention Description and Replication Checklist20 cited
    • 2022Assessing journal author guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: findings from an institutional sample19 cited
    • 2023The endorsement of general and artificial intelligence reporting guidelines in radiological journals: a meta-research study19 cited
    • 2021Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of orthopedic trauma literature: A cross-sectional review17 cited
    • 2019Endorsement of reporting guidelines and study registration by endocrine and internal medicine journals: meta-epidemiological study16 cited
    • 2021Clinical Trial Registry Use in Orthopaedic Surgery Systematic Reviews16 cited
    • 2020Biomedical conferences’ author instructions rarely mention guidelines for reporting abstracts of trials and systematic reviews14 cited
    • 2022Registration and primary outcome reporting in behavioral health trials14 cited
    • 2020Poor compliance of clinical trial registration among trials included in systematic reviews: a cohort study14 cited
    • 2022Harms-related data are poorly reported among randomized controlled trials underpinning the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline recommendations for rotator cuff injuries12 cited