Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Technology and Teacher–Student Interactions: A Review of Empirical Research

16 references·2 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1968The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.46,361 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
1988Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook20,700 cited
1986Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods10,315 cited
1968The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research6,679 cited
1965The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis4,598 cited
2002Quarterly Review of Distance Education1,627 cited
2013Observations of Effective Teacher–Student Interactions in Secondary School Classrooms: Predicting Student Achievement With the Classroom Assessment Scoring System—Secondary466 cited
2006Implementation and Effects Of One-to-One Computing Initiatives456 cited
2002Investigating Teacher-Student Interactions That Foster Self-Regulated Learning388 cited
2007Defining a Literature162 cited
1997What Have We Learned about Developmentally Appropriate Practice? Research in Review.145 cited
2016One-to-One Technology in K–12 Classrooms: A Review of the Literature From 2004 Through 2014142 cited
2014Exploring young students' talk in iPad-supported collaborative learning environments124 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2010Technology, learning and instruction: distributed cognition in the secondary English classroom47 cited

2015Situated cognition and learning environments: implications for teachers on- and offline in the new digital media age45 cited

Cited by

2021Engineering education amid a global pandemic64 cited
2024How equally do teachers distribute their attention across students classified as English learners (ELs) and their non-EL peers in science classrooms? A frequency analysis of monolingual and bilingual teachers’ interactions with different student grouping configurations5 cited