SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Using machine learning to advance synthesis and use of conservation and environmental evidence
7 references·16 citing·52 second hopsampled
Using machine learning to advance synthesis and use of conservation and environmental evidence (2018)Using machine learning to advance synthes…Using machine learning to disentangle homonyms in large text corpora (2017)Using machine learning to dis…Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Using text mining for study i…Text analysis tools for identification of emerging topics and research gaps in conservation science (2015)Text analysis tools for ident…Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Erratum to: Using text mining…Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Living Systematic Reviews: An…Bibliometric analysis of global environmental assessment research in a 20-year period (2014)Bibliometric analysis of glob…Doing more good than harm – Building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management (2009)Doing more good than harm – B…Streamlining systematic reviews with large language models using prompt engineering and retrieval augmented generation (2025)Streamlining systematic revie…Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid scoping, mapping and evidence and gap map (‘Big Picture Reviews’) (2025)Rapid reviews methods series:…Towards the automation of systematic reviews using natural language processing, machine learning, and deep learning: a comprehensive review (2024)Towards the automation of sys…The SAFE procedure: a practical stopping heuristic for active learning-based screening in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2024)The SAFE procedure: a practic…Leveraging AI to improve evidence synthesis in conservation (2024)Leveraging AI to improve evid…Greenwashing in the food industry: A systematic review exploring the current situation and possible countermeasures (2024)Greenwashing in the food indu…Climate change science is evolving toward adaptation and mitigation solutions (2024)Climate change science is evo…Reducing Literature Screening Workload With Machine Learning (2023)Reducing Literature Screening…Performance of active learning models for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: a simulation study into the Average Time to Discover relevant records (2023)Performance of active learnin…Choosing the Right Tool for the Job: Screening Tools for Systematic Reviews in Education (2023)Choosing the Right Tool for t…Machine learning computational tools to assist the performance of systematic reviews: A mapping review (2022)Machine learning computationa…An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)An open source machine learni…Optimising the process for conducting scoping reviews (2020)Optimising the process for co…Active learning for screening prioritization in systematic reviews - A simulation study (2020)Active learning for screening…Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy (2018)Systematic reviews and maps a…revtools: An R package to support article screening for evidence synthesis (2018)revtools: An R package to sup…The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)topicmodels : An R Package for Fitting Topic Models (2011)Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts (2013)The difficulties of systematic reviews (2017)Research Weaving: Visualizing the Future of Research Synthesis (2018)revtools: An R package to support article screening for evidence synthesis (2019)The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care (1993)Monitoring and Evaluation in Conservation: a Review of Trends and Approaches (2005)Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management (2006)Evaluating and improving the reliability of evidence syntheses in conservation and environmental science: A methodology (2014)Conceptualizing the transfer of knowledge across cases in transdisciplinary research (2017)Placing Transdisciplinarity in Context: A Review of Approaches to Connect Scholars, Society and Action (2019)Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization (2004)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Eco-innovation in the transition to a circular economy: An analytical literature review (2017)Research trends in food chemistry: A bibliometric review of its 40 years anniversary (1976–2016) (2019)Visualization analysis of big data research based on Citespace (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application (2019)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas (2016)Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)The value of a second reviewer for study selection in systematic reviews (2019)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)A Scoping Review of Empirical Evidence on (Digital) Public Services Co-Creation (2021)SYMBALS: A Systematic Review Methodology Blending Active Learning and Snowballing (2021)Methods for using Bing's AI‐powered search engine for data extraction for a systematic review (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Can artificial intelligence separate the wheat from the chaff in systematic reviews of health economic articles? (2023)Utilizing ASReview in screening primary studies for meta-research in SLA: A step-by-step tutorial (2024)The AI risk repository: A meta-review, database, and taxonomy of risks from artificial intelligence (2026)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)An evaluation of the performance of stopping rules in AI ‐aided screening for psychological meta‐analytical research (2024)Evaluating the effectiveness of large language models in abstract screening: a comparative analysis (2024)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Evidence Synthesis: An Investigation of Methods Employed in Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration, and Environmental Evidence Reviews (2025)Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: Update of a living systematic review (2025)Testing the utility of GPT for title and abstract screening in environmental systematic evidence synthesis (2025)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2015Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches680 cited
  • 2014Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap595 cited
  • 2015Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches353 cited
  • 2009Doing more good than harm – Building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management297 cited
  • 2014Bibliometric analysis of global environmental assessment research in a 20-year period292 cited
  • 2015Text analysis tools for identification of emerging topics and research gaps in conservation science123 cited
  • 2017Using machine learning to disentangle homonyms in large text corpora46 cited

Cited by

  • 2024The SAFE procedure: a practical stopping heuristic for active learning-based screening in systematic reviews and meta-analyses144 cited
  • 2021An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews106 cited
  • 2023Performance of active learning models for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: a simulation study into the Average Time to Discover relevant records96 cited
  • 2024Towards the automation of systematic reviews using natural language processing, machine learning, and deep learning: a comprehensive review87 cited
  • 2022Machine learning computational tools to assist the performance of systematic reviews: A mapping review85 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2018Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy70 cited
  • 2020Active learning for screening prioritization in systematic reviews - A simulation study51 cited
  • 2024Greenwashing in the food industry: A systematic review exploring the current situation and possible countermeasures44 cited
  • 2024Leveraging AI to improve evidence synthesis in conservation43 cited
  • 2025Streamlining systematic reviews with large language models using prompt engineering and retrieval augmented generation43 cited
  • 2023Reducing Literature Screening Workload With Machine Learning29 cited
  • 2023Choosing the Right Tool for the Job: Screening Tools for Systematic Reviews in Education28 cited
  • 2020Optimising the process for conducting scoping reviews28 cited
  • 2025Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid scoping, mapping and evidence and gap map (‘Big Picture Reviews’)23 cited
  • 2024Climate change science is evolving toward adaptation and mitigation solutions23 cited
  • 2018revtools: An R package to support article screening for evidence synthesis22 cited