On the effects of authority on peer motivation: L earning from W ikipedia

Helge Klapper · Markus G. Reitzig

46 citations0/0 files storedStrategic Management Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Wikis in Education and Collaboration Knowledge Management and Sharing Social Power and Status Dynamics

Abstract

Research Summary : We investigate the conditions under which authority can be deployed without reducing subordinate motivation. We show that lateral authority, the legitimacy to resolve task‐specific problems, is welcomed by members of an organization in the resolution of coordination conflicts, the more so (a) the fiercer the conflict to be resolved, (b) the higher the competence‐based status of the authority, (c) the lower the tenure of, and (d) the more focused the organizational members are. Analyzing the discussion behavior of members of Wikipedia between 2002 and 2014, we corroborate our allegations empirically by analyzing 642,916 article–discussion pages. Our findings, obtained for a modern collective production community, provide learning opportunities for how traditional organizations may want to govern activities of their idiosyncratically motivated staff. Managerial Summary : When managers use their (legitimate) power to take decisions on behalf of their staff, they risk setting back employees and making them detach from the firm. This danger is particularly salient whenever highly motivated teams of staff autonomously work on corporate problems and are used to governing themselves. Examples range from skunkwork initiatives within traditional firms to entire team‐based organizations, such as Valve or Zappos. When and how managers can add value by resolving conflicts within and across these teams once their self‐organization fails is what we study in this article. Inspired by data from Wikipedia, we suggest that managers should not intervene prematurely, benefit from visible competence, and are respected most for their actions by specialized peers who recently joined the organization.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 46 citations exist upstream.

References

1976Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure 2000Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.1937The Nature of the Firm 1965Exchange and Power in Social Life.1975Helplessness: On Depression, Development, and Death 1973Designing Complex Organizations 1978Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization.1968The American Occupational Structure.

Cited by

2024Organization Design: Current Insights and Future Research Directions 2024Supply chain digitalization and firms' green innovation: Evidence from a pilot program 2025Decentralization in Organizations: A Revolution or a Mirage?2020Gender, power and emotions in the collaborative production of knowledge: A large-scale analysis of Wikipedia editor conversations 2021Organizing Entrepreneurial Teams: A Field Experiment on Autonomy over Choosing Teams and Ideas

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.