An epistemological critique of social entrepreneurship definitions

Amir Forouharfar · Seyed Aligholi Rowshan · Habibollah Salarzehi

32 citations0/0 files storedJournal of global entrepreneurship research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences Innovation, Technology, and Society Community Development and Social Impact

Abstract

If entrepreneurship is amid jungle of theories and has many theorists, its social orientation or what is known as social entrepreneurship (SE) is amid arid land of theories and suffers under-theorizing which could be inherently stemmed from its diversely proposed definitions. To be situated in an embryonic pre-paradigmatic phase, getting to a more unanimous definition in this realm is the first step in laying a solid foundation for SE theorizing. As a pioneering study, the paper aims to investigate the epistemological foundations of SE definitions critically to propose a more convergent definition for SE. To fulfill this goal epistemological justifications for the definitional components of SE are presented. Therefore, it was necessary to rely on the relevant philosophical schools of thought in Epistemology (e.g. Empiricism , Internalism , Externalism, Verificationism and Falsificationism ); first to discuss the controversies and oppositions to some components of the definitions for their exclusion and then to justify some other definitional components which are mostly accepted by the scholars for their inclusion in a final SE definition. Critical approach has helped us in specifying the maneuvering of thoughts in this field and determining the epistemological and definitional boundaries of SE. Finally, a more epistemologically-supported and justified definition was presented at the end of the paper. Moreover, one of the potential contributions of this paper could be its consensus-making impact among SE scholars in defining SE phenomenon, which could also pave the way for future theorizing in SE. The originality of the paper lies in the application of Internalism , Externalism, Verificationism and Falsificationism concepts to SE definitions.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 32 citations exist upstream.

References

1998Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development 1984Research in Organizational Behavior 1996Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance 2015Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2005Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight 1991A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior 2006Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?1985Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Cited by

2024Evaluating definitions of social entrepreneurship: A rulebook from the philosophy of science 2021How do social entrepreneurs develop technological innovation?2024Leveraging Ubuntu-inspired values to promote sustainable digital entrepreneurship in Africa 2021Social entrepreneurship review: a gap in the Latin American context 2021‘From Depending on Aid to Investing in Social Enterprise’ Doing the Usual Business in an Unusual Way: How Tochi Community Transformation Initiative (TOCOTI) Can Use the Concept of ‘Social Enterprise’ To Harness Sustainable Development in Tochi County

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.