Work values across generations in China

Jun Yang · Chun‐Sheng Yu · Jun Wu

26 citations0/0 files storedChinese Management Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Generational Differences and Trends Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Cultural Differences and Values

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how the perceived importance of work values differs among the three generations (Cultural Revolution, Social Reform and Millennial) in the Chinese workforce. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in work values and generation theories, hypotheses were tested by empirical data collected from 464 Chinese employees from companies located in the Yangtze River Delta of China. A one-way multivariate analysis of covariance and a series of one-way analysis of covariance and t-tests were conducted to compare the three generations with respect to work values. Findings The results revealed significant generational differences existing in China with respect to extrinsic–intrinsic work values measured by the work-need typology (Huseman and Hatfield, 1990). After controlling for demographic variables, Millennial employees were found to show the highest preference for both extrinsic and intrinsic work values, followed by the Social Reform generation, whereas the Cultural Revolution generation scored lowest. Additionally, important similarities across the three generations were also found. Research limitations/implications These findings highlight the complex nature of generational phenomena and suggest the need to further develop a deep appreciation and understanding of the underlying reasons for those generational differences and similarities. Originality/value Drawing from generation and work values theory, the authors developed a theoretical framework that allows us to directly compare the three generations in the Chinese workforce with respect to the magnitude of importance each generation attaches to various work priorities. The present study represents an important initial step in throwing more light on the mechanisms underlying the observed generational differences and similarities in work values.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

2000Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.1943A theory of human motivation.1970Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research 2017A THEORY OF HUMAN MOTIVATION 2002Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals 2000Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index.1994Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?2005CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS' FIT AT WORK: A META‐ANALYSIS OF PERSON–JOB, PERSON–ORGANIZATION, PERSON–GROUP, AND PERSON–SUPERVISOR FIT

Cited by

2019Sustainable clothing: perspectives from US and Chinese young Millennials 2019Does “the servant as leader” translate into Chinese? A cross-cultural meta-analysis of servant leadership 2020Impact of work values and knowledge sharing on creative performance 2024Work values of Chinese generational cohorts 2023Exploring the Differences in Work Value Among Generations in the UAE

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.