References

• 2006Differences in Review Quality and Recommendations for Publication Between Peer Reviewers Suggested by Authors or by Editors147 cited
• 1998Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts122 cited
• 2006Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study88 cited
• 2016Why do peer reviewers decline to review manuscripts? A study of reviewer invitation responses63 cited
• 2010Do Author-Suggested Reviewers Rate Submissions More Favorably than Editor-Suggested Reviewers? A Study on Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics43 cited
• 2016Author‐suggested reviewers: gender differences and influences on the peer review process at an ecology journal42 cited
• 2007A Comparison of Reviewers Selected by Editors and Reviewers Suggested by Authors34 cited
• 2001The evaluation of peer‐review quality31 cited
• 2017Difficulty of recruiting reviewers predicts review scores and editorial decisions at six journals of ecology and evolution28 cited
• 2018What influences the regional diversity of reviewers: A study of medical and agricultural/biological sciences journals15 cited
• 2011Effect of Recommendations from Reviewers Suggested or Excluded by Authors14 cited
• 2011Peering into Peer-Review13 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.