Relationship between knowledge sharing and job satisfaction: a systematic review

Ghulam Murtaza Rafique · Khalid Mahmood

47 citations0/0 files storedInformation and Learning Sciences

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Knowledge Management and Sharing Employee Performance and Management Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to systematically collect and review the English language studies that provided empirical evidence for the existence of relationship between knowledge sharing (KS) and job satisfaction (JS) and their impact on each other. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review of the literature was conducted searching Google Scholar, LISTA, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses. Searches were completed through March 2017. Language limit was applied; and manual searching from review articles and some key studies using backward and forward citation from Google Scholar was also completed. Studies determining the relationship or correlation between KS and JS were included and books were excluded in this review. Data extraction and critical appraisal were performed to determine the risk of bias of each study. Findings The findings clearly reveal that these two variables had a significant relationship with and were influenced by each other. It is concluded that KS had a positive impact on JS and, similarly, JS had strong effect on KS among the individuals working in different organizations. Originality/value This review is first to examine the relationship between KS and JS and their impact on each other by systematically collecting and reviewing the English language studies. This study has theoretical and practical implications for managers and HR departments.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 47 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement 1997The Knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation 1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.1976The nature and causes of job satisfaction 2006Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide 2009Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research

Cited by

2021Trust and social network to boost tacit knowledge sharing with mediation of commitment: does culture moderate?2020The relationship between mobile self-efficacy and mobile-based personal information management practices 2022Job training satisfaction and knowledge sharing in IT company: a case study 2022Why serendipitous informal knowledge sharing interactions are key to boundary spanning and creativity

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.