Centers of gravity: The effect of stable shared leadership in top management teams on firm growth and industry evolution

Rajshree Agarwal · Serguey Braguinsky · Atsushi Ohyama

95 citations0/0 files storedStrategic Management Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Organizational Management and Leadership Corporate Finance and Governance Leadership and Management in Organizations

Abstract

Abstract Research Summary We study the processes of firm growth in the evolution of the Japanese cotton spinning industry during 1883–1914 by integrating strategy and historical approaches and utilizing rich quantitative firm‐level data and detailed business histories. The resultant conceptual model highlights growth outcomes of path dependencies as firms evolve across periods of single versus shared leadership, establish stability in shared leadership, or experience repeated discord‐induced top management team (TMT) leader departures. While most firms do not experience smooth transitions to stable shared TMT leadership, a focus on value creation, in conjunction with talent recruitment and promotion, enabled some firms to achieve stable shared leadership despite discord‐induced departures, engage in long‐term expansion, and emerge as “centers of gravity” for output and talent in the industry. Managerial Summary We demonstrate stable shared leadership is at root of firms who emerge as centers of gravity in an industry and account for the lion's share of output. Stable shared leadership enables growth strategies such as talent recruitment, product diversification, downstream integration, and acquisitions. Stable shared leadership, however, is extremely difficult to maintain. Most firms experience discord‐induced departures in TMTs due to politics and power struggles. Firms that deviate from this norm to become industry leaders achieve stable shared leadership by adhering to fundamental principles related to long‐term value creation as opposed to short‐term gain, adoption of merit‐based promotion systems in defiance of stereotypes, sharing of power within TMT leadership to enable efficient division of labor, and honorable resolution of conflicts and ethical breaches.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 95 citations exist upstream.

References

1984Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers 1984Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers 1962Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis 2010Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy 2002Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities 1978On the Size Distribution of Business Firms 1990Scale and Scope 1996DISTINGUISHING THE EFFECTS OF FUNCTIONAL AND DYSFUNCTIONAL CONFLICT ON STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING: RESOLVING A PARADOX FOR TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS.

Cited by

2024Top management team stability and ESG greenwashing: Evidence from China 2021Equity Crowdfunding Founder Teams: Campaign Success and Venture Failure 2022External Interfaces or Internal Processes? Market Positioning and Divergent Professionalization Paths in Young Ventures 2022Human Capital Resources: Reviewing the First Decade and Establishing a Foundation for Future Research 2022Enhancing value co-creation behaviour in digital peer-to-peer platforms: An integrated approach

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.