SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Hands Off the Wheel in Autonomous Vehicles?: A Systems Perspective on over a Million Miles of Field Data
5 references·5 citing·38 second hop
Hands Off the Wheel in Autonomous Vehicles?: A Systems Perspective on over a Million Miles of Field Data (2018)Hands Off the Wheel in Autonomous Vehicle…Autonomous vehicles’ disengagements: Trends, triggers, and regulatory limitations (2017)Autonomous vehicles’ disengag…Autonomous Vehicles: Disengagements, Accidents and Reaction Times (2016)Autonomous Vehicles: Disengag…Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability (2014)Intention to use a fully auto…The Coming Collision Between Autonomous Vehicles and the Liability System (2012)The Coming Collision Between …Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety (2012)Engineering a safer world: sy…When the automated driving system fails: Dynamics of public responses to automated vehicles (2021)When the automated driving sy…Blame Attribution Asymmetry in Human–Automation Cooperation (2021)Blame Attribution Asymmetry i…The effect of population age on the acceptable safety of self-driving vehicles (2019)The effect of population age …Machines versus humans: People’s biased responses to traffic accidents involving self-driving vehicles (2019)Machines versus humans: Peopl…Exploring the who, what, when, where, and why of automated vehicle disengagements (2019)Exploring the who, what, when…Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975)Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology (1989)Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives (1999)How and why do men and women differ in their willingness to use automated cars? The influence of emotions across different age groups (2016)Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving (2017)Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle (2014)Take-over again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop (2017)MIT Advanced Vehicle Technology Study: Large-Scale Naturalistic Driving Study of Driver Behavior and Interaction With Automation (2019)Perception of Risk (1987)Public Opinion on Automated Driving: Results of an International Questionnaire Among 5,000 Respondents (2014)Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle (2015)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)How do familiarity and fatal accidents affect acceptance of self-driving vehicles? (2021)Research on run-time risk evaluation method based on operating scenario data for autonomous train (2022)Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse (1997)The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice (2003)Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2019 Annual Meeting (2019)Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models (1982)Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. (1983)Risk as feelings. (2001)Public perception of autonomous vehicle capability determines judgment of blame and trust in road traffic accidents (2023)Command responsibility in military AI contexts: balancing theory and practicality (2024)The Organization–AI–User Responsibility Triangle: Public Understandings of AI and Expectations for Organizational Responses in AI-Service-Failure Crises (2025)A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis (1965)Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance (2004)Cybernetics. Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine (1949)Organizational culture and leadership (2012)Understanding the impacts of mobile phone distraction on driving performance: A systematic review (2016)Bridging the Gap Between Ethics and Practice (2020)Closing the AI accountability gap (2020)Never Mind the Trolley: The Ethics of Autonomous Vehicles in Mundane Situations (2018)Liable, but Not in Control? Ensuring Meaningful Human Agency in Automated Decision‐Making Systems (2019)Ethical issues in focus by the autonomous vehicles industry (2021)Perceived safety and attributed value as predictors of the intention to use autonomous vehicles: A national study with Spanish drivers (2019)Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver’s driving styles (2021)Toward human-vehicle collaboration: Review and perspectives on human-centered collaborative automated driving (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety1,566 cited
  • 2014Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability695 cited
  • 2016Autonomous Vehicles: Disengagements, Accidents and Reaction Times399 cited
  • 2017Autonomous vehicles’ disengagements: Trends, triggers, and regulatory limitations271 cited
  • 2012The Coming Collision Between Autonomous Vehicles and the Liability System139 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Exploring the who, what, when, where, and why of automated vehicle disengagements129 cited
  • 2021Blame Attribution Asymmetry in Human–Automation Cooperation65 cited
  • 2019Machines versus humans: People’s biased responses to traffic accidents involving self-driving vehicles65 cited
  • 2019The effect of population age on the acceptable safety of self-driving vehicles60 cited
  • 2021When the automated driving system fails: Dynamics of public responses to automated vehicles50 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work