SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A novel approach to sharing all available information from funded health research: the NIHR Journals Library
16 references·0 citing·41 second hop
A novel approach to sharing all available information from funded health research: the NIHR Journals Library (2018)A novel approach to sharing all available…Recent trends in academic journal growth (2016)Recent trends in academic jou…Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reducing waste from incomplet…Extent of Non-Publication in Cohorts of Studies Approved by Research Ethics Committees or Included in Trial Registries (2014)Extent of Non-Publication in …Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials (2014)Evidence for the Selective Re…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Open access: The true cost of…Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials (2012)Quality of descriptions of tr…Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)Does use of the CONSORT State…Reporting of participant flow diagrams in published reports of randomized trials (2011)Reporting of participant flow…Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Comparison of Registered and …Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)Avoidable Waste in the Produc…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (2008)What is missing from descript…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing (1999)How can medical journals help…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. (2011)The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)Exploratory Research (2020)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: The CALO-RE taxonomy (2011)Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data) (2015)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach (2015)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
  • 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
  • 2012Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa628 cited
  • 2008What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?613 cited
  • 2009Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence600 cited
  • 2013Open access: The true cost of science publishing524 cited
  • 2014Extent of Non-Publication in Cohorts of Studies Approved by Research Ethics Committees or Included in Trial Registries269 cited
  • 2014Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials187 cited
  • 1999How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

114 cited
  • 2011Reporting of participant flow diagrams in published reports of randomized trials84 cited
  • 2016Recent trends in academic journal growth77 cited
  • 2012Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials63 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.