Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Inspecting the Merit System’s “Pivotal Idea”: Does Competitive Examination Increase the Qualifications and Quality of the U.S. Federal Service?

15 references·1 citing·47 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1999Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart3,562 cited
2004The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation1,002 cited
1968Democracy and the Public Service489 cited
1981Employment testing: Old theories and new research findings.354 cited
2007Testing Pendleton's Premise: Do Political Appointees Make Worse Bureaucrats?216 cited
2011The Consequences of Presidential Patronage for Federal Agency Performance151 cited
1995The Foundation of Merit124 cited
1992Responsiveness and Neutral Competence in American Bureaucracy117 cited
2013Meritocracy in Asia Pacific75 cited
2012The Impact of Veterans' Preference on the Composition and Quality of the Federal Civil Service34 cited
2012Civil Service Reform in China25 cited
2014Service after Serving: Does Veterans' Preference Diminish the Quality of the US Federal Service?24 cited
1994Deregulating the public service: can government be improved?20 cited
2012Performance Ratings and Career Advancement in the US Federal Civil Service18 cited
2010The British Civil Service: Perspectives on ‘Decline’ and ‘Modernisation’16 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2020NOMEAÇÕES PARA CARGOS COMISSIONADOS E GRUPOS DE INTERESSE: USOS, MOTIVAÇÕES E DESAFIOS RETRATADOS EM PESQUISAS RECENTES8 cited