Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Efficiency of Online Grammar Checker in English Writing Performance and Students’ Perceptions

11 references·3 citing·48 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,335 cited
2001Error feedback in L2 writing classes979 cited
2004The “Grammar Correction” Debate in L2 Writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?)679 cited
1986Salience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality562 cited
1991An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written Feedback to the Development of Second-Language Writing Skills501 cited
2006Automated writing evaluation: defining the classroom research agenda337 cited
2008Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes303 cited
1998“If I only had more time:” ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions277 cited
2010Effects of Dynamic Corrective Feedback on ESL Writing Accuracy252 cited
2011Potential of Automated Writing Evaluation Feedback94 cited
2001Exploiting the Potential of a Computer-Based Grammar Checker in Conjunction with Self-Monitoring Strategies with Advanced Level Students of French40 cited

Cited by

2019An AI-based English Grammar Checker vs. Human Raters in Evaluating EFL Learners’ Writing27 cited
2025The Impact of AI Writing Tools on Academic Integrity: Unveiling English-Majored Students’ Perceptions and Practical Solutions19 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2024“Don’t Let Grammarly Overwrite Your Style and Voice:” Writers’ Advice on Using Grammarly in Writing9 cited