A Failure to Regulate? The Demands and Dilemmas of Tackling Illegal Content and Behaviour on Social Media

Majid Yar

44 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Cybersecurity Intelligence and Cybercrime

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Freedom of Expression and Defamation Digitalization, Law, and Regulation Law, Rights, and Freedoms

Abstract

The proliferation and user uptake of social media applications has brought in its wake a growing problem of illegal and harmful interactions and content online. Recent controversy has arisen around issues ranging from the alleged online manipulation of the 2016 US presidential election by Russian hackers and ‘trolls’, to the misuse of users’ Facebook data by the political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica (Hall 2018; Swaine & Bennetts 2018). These recent issues notwithstanding, in the UK context, ongoing concern has focused in particular upon (a) sexually-oriented and abusive content about or directed at children, and (b) content that is racially or religiously hateful, incites violence and promotes or celebrates terrorist violence. Legal innovation has sought to make specific provision for such online offences, and offenders have been subject to prosecution in some widely-publicised cases. Nevertheless, as a whole, the business of regulating (identifying, blocking, removing and reporting) offending content has been left largely to social media providers themselves. This has been sustained by concerns both practical (the amount of public resource that would be required to police social media) and political (concerns about excessive state surveillance and curtailment of free speech in liberal democracies). However, growing evidence about providers’ unwillingness and/or inability to effectively stem the flow of illegal and harmful content has created a crisis for the existing self-regulatory model. Consequently, we now see a range of proposals that would take a much more coercive and punitive stance toward media platforms, so as to compel them into taking more concerted action. Taking the UK as a primary focus, these proposals are considered and assessed, with a view to charting possible future configurations for tackling illegal social media content.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 44 citations exist upstream.

References

1979Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach 2010Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach (1979)20124 What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software 1996The New Governance: Governing without Government 2010Bullying, Cyberbullying, and Suicide 2002Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State–Theoretical Perspective 2007Understanding Governance: Ten Years On 2006Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Aggression, Threats, and Distress

Cited by

2019Protecting children from internet pornography? A critical assessment of statutory age verification and its enforcement in the UK 2021The danger of “fake news”: how using social media for information dissemination can inhibit the ethical decision making process 2025CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR PAID DISINFORMATION IN THE DIGITAL WORLD: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN UAE LAW AND THE EUROPEAN DIGITAL SERVICES ACT (DSA)2023Accessibility and Inclusiveness of New Information and Communication Technologies for Disabled Users and Content Creators in the Metaverse

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.