Experience Sampling Methods: A Discussion of Critical Trends and Considerations for Scholarly Advancement
Abstract
In the organizational sciences, scholars are increasingly using experience sampling methods (ESM) to answer questions tied to intraindividual, dynamic phenomenon. However, employing this method to answer organizational research questions comes with a number of complex—and often difficult—decisions surrounding: (1) how the implementation of ESM can advance or elucidate prior between-person theorizing at the within-person level of analysis, (2) how scholars should effectively and efficiently assess within-person constructs, and (3) analytic concerns regarding the proper modeling of interdependent assessments and trends while controlling for potentially confounding factors. The current paper addresses these challenges via a panel of seven researchers who are familiar not only with implementing this methodology but also related theoretical and analytic challenges in this domain. The current paper provides timely, actionable insights aimed toward addressing several complex issues that scholars often face when implementing ESM in their research.
Cite this
Allison S. Gabriel, Nathan Philip Podsakoff, Daniel Judson Beal, Brent A. Scott, Sabine Sonnentag, John P. Trougakos, … Marcus M. Butts (2018). Experience Sampling Methods: A Discussion of Critical Trends and Considerations for Scholarly Advancement. Organizational Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118802626
@article{s2018experience,
title = {Experience Sampling Methods: A Discussion of Critical Trends and Considerations for Scholarly Advancement},
author = {Gabriel, Allison S. and Podsakoff, Nathan Philip and Beal, Daniel Judson and Scott, Brent A. and Sonnentag, Sabine and Trougakos, John P. and Butts, Marcus M.},
year = {2018},
journal = {Organizational Research Methods},
doi = {10.1177/1094428118802626}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 755 citations exist upstream.