SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Attitudes toward Open Access, Open Peer Review, and Altmetrics among Contributors to Spanish Scholarly Journals
15 references·16 citing·53 second hop
Attitudes toward Open Access, Open Peer Review, and Altmetrics among Contributors to Spanish Scholarly Journals (2018)Attitudes toward Open Access, Open Peer R…Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics’ OA practice (2017)Who support open access publi…What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers (2017)Peer review: The experience a…Imagining a Gold Open Access Future: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Funding Scenarios among Authors of Academic Scholarship (2017)Imagining a Gold Open Access …Do ResearchGate Scores create ghost academic reputations? (2017)Do ResearchGate Scores create…Academics' behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals (2017)Academics' behaviors and atti…Why do people use news differently on SNSs? An investigation of the role of motivations, media repertoires, and technology cluster on citizens' news-related activities (2015)Why do people use news differ…How library and information science faculty perceive and engage with open access (2015)How library and information s…Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands (2015)Gender contributes to persona…Awareness and Attitudes about Open Access Publishing: A Glance at Generational Differences (2014)Awareness and Attitudes about…Attitudes towards open access: A meta-synthesis of the empirical literature (2014)Attitudes towards open access…Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers (2012)Peer review in a changing wor…The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites (2007)The Benefits of Facebook “Fri…The “Green” and “Gold” Roads to Open Access: The Case for Mixing and Matching (2004)The “Green” and “Gold” Roads …The cost profiles of alternative approaches to journal publishing (1969)The cost profiles of alternat…Additional experiments required: A scoping review of recent evidence on key aspects of Open Peer Review (2024)Additional experiments requir…The APC-Effect: Stratification in Open Access Publishing (2022)The APC-Effect: Stratificatio…Perceptions regarding open science appraised by editors of scholarly publications published in Spain (2022)Perceptions regarding open sc…Drivers and barriers in the transition to open science: the perspective of stakeholders in the Spanish scientific community (2022)Drivers and barriers in the t…Changing the Academic Gender Narrative through Open Access (2022)Changing the Academic Gender …Attitudes, willingness, and resources to cover article publishing charges: The influence of age, position, income level country, discipline and open access habits (2022)Attitudes, willingness, and r…A longitudinal study of the evolution of opinions about open access and its main features: a twitter sentiment analysis (2022)A longitudinal study of the e…Philosophers' perceptions of pay to publish and open access in Spain: Books versus journals, more than a financial dilemma (2021)Philosophers' perceptions of …El Efecto Matilda en la red de coautorías Hispanoamericana en Comunicación (2021)El Efecto Matilda en la red d…Classification and analysis of PubPeer comments: How a web journal club is used (2021)Classification and analysis o…Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review—A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists (2021)Attitudes and practices of op…Adopting open access in an emerging country: Is gender inequality a barrier in humanities and social sciences? (2021)Adopting open access in an em…How is open access publishing going down with early career researchers? An international, multi-disciplinary study (2020)How is open access publishing…Descubrir, leer, publicar, compartir y monitorizar el progreso: comportamiento de los investigadores junior españoles (2020)Descubrir, leer, publicar, co…Reputación y comunicación científica: investigadores españoles en el inicio de su carrera (2019)Reputación y comunicación cie…Does the scholarly communication system satisfy the beliefs and aspirations of new researchers? Summarizing the Harbingers research (2019)Does the scholarly communicat…Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives (1999)Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions (2000)Determinants of News Sharing Behavior on Social Media (2019)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)The Paradox of Participation Versus Misinformation: Social Media, Political Engagement, and the Spread of Misinformation (2019)Mistrust, Disinforming News, and Vote Choice: A Panel Survey on the Origins and Consequences of Believing Disinformation in the 2017 German Parliamentary Election (2020)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions (2021)The deconstructed journal — a new model for academic publishing (1999)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Self‐archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences (2006)Scholarly Communication 2.0: Exploring Researchers' Opinions on Web 2.0 for Scientific Knowledge Creation, Evaluation and Dissemination (2011)The citation advantage of author-pays model: the case of Springer and Elsevier OA journals (2015)Response Rate and Response Quality of Internet-Based Surveys: An Experimental Study (2004)Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2011)Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review (2020)Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s “Mirror Journal” system (2021)Society and the Adolescent Self-Image (1965)The Strength of Weak Ties (1973)Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital (1988)Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students' Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation (2009)A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization (2012)Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out (2013)Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. (1989)Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆ (2009)Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations (2018)Scaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation (2019)Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations (2020)Survey Methods in Social Investigation. (1958)Digital natives: Where is the evidence? (2009)The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery (2009)Drivers and Obstacles of Open Access Publishing. A Qualitative Investigation of Individual and Institutional Factors (2020)Faculty knowledge and attitudes regarding predatory open access journals: a needs assessment study (2020)Research methods for IDs and TBLT: A substantive and methodological review (2024)Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication (2000)A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012)Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review (2018)What happens when a journal converts to open access? A bibliometric analysis (2021)Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network (2014)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)Author-level metrics in the new academic profile platforms: The online behaviour of the Bibliometrics community (2018)Research universities on the ResearchGate social networking site: An examination of institutional differences, research activity level, and social networks formed (2018)Use of author identifier services (ORCID, ResearcherID) and academic social networks (Academia.edu, ResearchGate) by the researchers of the University of Caen Normandy (France): A case study (2020)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought (2013)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites9,932 cited
  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review453 cited
  • 2012Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers393 cited
  • 2015Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands305 cited
  • 2004The “Green” and “Gold” Roads to Open Access: The Case for Mixing and Matching114 cited
  • 2015Why do people use news differently on SNSs? An investigation of the role of motivations, media repertoires, and technology cluster on citizens' news-related activities114 cited
  • 2014Awareness and Attitudes about Open Access Publishing: A Glance at Generational Differences110 cited
  • 2017Academics' behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals107 cited
  • 2017Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics’ OA practice101 cited
  • 2017Do ResearchGate Scores create ghost academic reputations?86 cited
  • 2017Imagining a Gold Open Access Future: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Funding Scenarios among Authors of Academic Scholarship82 cited
  • 2017Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers77 cited
  • 2015How library and information science faculty perceive and engage with open access50 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1969The cost profiles of alternative approaches to journal publishing47 cited
  • 2014Attitudes towards open access: A meta-synthesis of the empirical literature41 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Classification and analysis of PubPeer comments: How a web journal club is used38 cited
    • 2021Adopting open access in an emerging country: Is gender inequality a barrier in humanities and social sciences?34 cited
    • 2020How is open access publishing going down with early career researchers? An international, multi-disciplinary study27 cited
    • 2019Does the scholarly communication system satisfy the beliefs and aspirations of new researchers? Summarizing the Harbingers research24 cited
    • 2021Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review—A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists23 cited
    • 2024Additional experiments required: A scoping review of recent evidence on key aspects of Open Peer Review23 cited
    • 2022Attitudes, willingness, and resources to cover article publishing charges: The influence of age, position, income level country, discipline and open access habits23 cited
    • 2019Reputación y comunicación científica: investigadores españoles en el inicio de su carrera23 cited
    • 2022Perceptions regarding open science appraised by editors of scholarly publications published in Spain17 cited
    • 2020Descubrir, leer, publicar, compartir y monitorizar el progreso: comportamiento de los investigadores junior españoles14 cited
    • 2021Philosophers' perceptions of pay to publish and open access in Spain: Books versus journals, more than a financial dilemma14 cited
    • 2021El Efecto Matilda en la red de coautorías Hispanoamericana en Comunicación12 cited
    • 2022Drivers and barriers in the transition to open science: the perspective of stakeholders in the Spanish scientific community11 cited
    • 2022Changing the Academic Gender Narrative through Open Access10 cited
    • 2022A longitudinal study of the evolution of opinions about open access and its main features: a twitter sentiment analysis9 cited
    • 2022The APC-Effect: Stratification in Open Access Publishing8 cited