SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Revised guidelines to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of research published in American Physiological Society journals
5 references·3 citing·34 second hop
Revised guidelines to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of research published in American Physiological Society journals (2018)Revised guidelines to enhance the rigor a…Statistical considerations in reporting cardiovascular research (2018)Statistical considerations in…Crisis or self-correction: Rethinking media narratives about the well-being of science (2018)Crisis or self-correction: Re…The challenges of replication (2017)The challenges of replicationCONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)CONSORT 2010 statement: Updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility (2022)Quality Output Checklist and …Insufficient reporting of experimental variables as a cause for nonreproducibility in animal physiology? A case study (2022)Insufficient reporting of exp…Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool (AIMRDA) for the Peer-Review of Studies Assessing the Anticancer Activity of Natural Products: A Step towards Reproducibility (2021)Development of a Critical App…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses (2014)Evaluating the effectiveness of behavior change techniques in health-related behavior: a scoping review of methods used (2018)An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services (2022)Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Reproducibility of research: Issues and proposed remedies (2018)The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative (2019)Reproducibility in the Social Sciences (2022)Reproducible Research in Computational Science (2011)What does research reproducibility mean? (2016)Reporting of Basic Statistical Methods in Biomedical Journals: Improved SAMPL Guidelines (2020)The OHStat Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies and Clinical Trials in Oral Health Research: Manuscript Checklist (2024)Why most published research findings are false (2008)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications (2014)An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research (2014)Making sense of replications (2017)Benign and malignant scientific irreproducibility (2018)Clinical EFT as an evidence-based practice for the treatment of psychological and physiological conditions: A systematic review (2022)Issues and Challenges to Reproducibility of Cancer Research: A Commentary (2022)Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication (2016)The evolutionary implications of epigenetic inheritance (2017)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Open Research: Examples of good practice, and resources across disciplines (2025 edition) (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Identifying spin bias of nonsignificant findings in biomedical studies (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2011CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,041 cited
  • 2018Statistical considerations in reporting cardiovascular research85 cited
  • 2018Crisis or self-correction: Rethinking media narratives about the well-being of science64 cited
  • 2017The challenges of replication27 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility18 cited
  • 2021Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool (AIMRDA) for the Peer-Review of Studies Assessing the Anticancer Activity of Natural Products: A Step towards Reproducibility15 cited
  • 2022Insufficient reporting of experimental variables as a cause for nonreproducibility in animal physiology? A case study11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work