The Metainductive Justification of Induction: The Pool of Strategies

Tom F. Sterkenburg

31 citations0/0 files storedPhilosophy of Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophy and History of Science Philosophy, Science, and History

Abstract

This article poses a challenge to Schurz’s proposed metainductive justification of induction. It is argued that Schurz’s argument requires a notion of optimality that can deal with an expanding pool of prediction strategies.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

References

2006Prediction, Learning, and Games 2003Inference to the Best Explanation 1967The Foundations Of Scientific Inference 1994Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory.1997Using and combining predictors that specialize 2000Hume's Problem 2008The Meta-inductivist's Winning Strategy in the Prediction Game: A New Approach to Hume's Problem 2019Hume's Problem Solved

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.