Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Evolutionary arguments against moral realism: Why the empirical details matter (and which ones do)

16 references·1 citing·31 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1907The descent of man and selection in relation to sex10,909 cited
2005A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value1,247 cited
2003Moral Realism982 cited
2004Moral realism: a defence493 cited
2014The moral fixed points: new directions for moral nonnaturalism278 cited
2009The epistemological challenge to metanormative realism: how best to understand it, and how to cope with it234 cited
2017The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics211 cited
2008REPLY TO COPP: NATURALISM, NORMATIVITY, AND THE VARIETIES OF REALISM WORTH WORRYING ABOUT191 cited
2013Evolutionary Debunking, Moral Realism and Moral Knowledge177 cited
2012Morality and Mathematics: The Evolutionary Challenge149 cited
2014Debunking evolutionary debunking of ethical realism143 cited
2010On the Evolutionary Debunking of Morality141 cited
2009Darwin and moral realism: survival of the iffiest135 cited
2016Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Rethink It135 cited
2015A liberal realist answer to debunking skeptics: the empirical case for realism84 cited
2014Does Evolutionary Psychology Show That Normativity Is Mind-Dependent?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

74 cited

Cited by

2019Explaining historical moral convergence: the empirical case against realist intuitionism19 cited