SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Making a Difference Through Quality Manuscript Review
7 references·1 citing·41 second hop
Making a Difference Through Quality Manuscript Review (2018)Making a Difference Through Quality Manus…HRDQ Submissions of Quantitative Research Reports: Three Common Comments in Decision Letters and a Checklist (2017)HRDQ Submissions of Quantitat…Writing an Effective Manuscript Review: The 6 “Be's” to Success (2013)Writing an Effective Manuscri…Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective (2013)Rethinking feedback practices…Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples (2005)Writing Integrative Literatur…Peer Review and the Social Construction of Knowledge in the Management Discipline (2004)Peer Review and the Social Co…HOW TO REVIEW A PAPER (2003)HOW TO REVIEW A PAPERManuscript peer review: a helpful checklist for students and novice referees. (2000)Manuscript peer review: a hel…The Ideal Review Process Is a Three-Way Street (2023)The Ideal Review Process Is a…The One-Minute Manager (1983)How to review a manuscript (2010)The Value and Process of High-Quality Peer Review in Scientific Professional Journals (2019)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Local Knowledge: Further Essays In Interpretive Anthropology (1983)Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing (2001)GENERATING RESEARCH QUESTIONS THROUGH PROBLEMATIZATION. (2011)Has Management Studies Lost Its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research (2012)ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing (2023)Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis (1995)From Teaching to Learning — A New Paradigm For Undergraduate Education (1995)Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice (2006)Authentic assessment: creating a blueprint for course design (2017)Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2017)Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy (2020)Research in Organizational Behavior. (1986)Crafting a Job: Revisioning Employees as Active Crafters of Their Work (2001)Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (2002)Training Transfer: An Integrative Literature Review (2007)Reconstructing the Giant: On the Importance of Rigour in Documenting the Literature Search Process (2009)Writing Integrative Literature Reviews (2016)What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for Assessing Peer Reviews of Manuscripts (1999)Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)Ethics and scientific publication (2005)Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Handbook (2008)Perceptions of Ethical Problems with Scientific Journal Peer Review: An Exploratory Study (2008)Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Peer review: reform or revolution? (1997)Peer review as professional responsibility: A quality control system only as good as the participants (2007)A scoping review on biomedical journal peer review guides for reviewers (2021)Defining quality in peer review reports: a scoping review (2025)A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research (2000)Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (2003)Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2012)A dimensional analysis of psychological empowerment on engagement (2019)Personal growth initiative as a predictor of psychological empowerment: The mediating role of job crafting (2019)Personal growth initiative: the effects of person–organization fit, work empowerment and authentic leadership (2020)Guidelines for Conducting Research and Publishing in Marketing: From Conceptualization through the Review Process (2001)The Manuscript Review Process (2003)Editor's Comments: Why Review? Because Reviewing is a Professional Responsibility (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples3,505 cited
  • 2013Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective967 cited
  • 2004Peer Review and the Social Construction of Knowledge in the Management Discipline234 cited
  • 2003HOW TO REVIEW A PAPER143 cited
  • 2000Manuscript peer review: a helpful checklist for students and novice referees.69 cited
  • 2017HRDQ Submissions of Quantitative Research Reports: Three Common Comments in Decision Letters and a Checklist25 cited
  • 2013Writing an Effective Manuscript Review: The 6 “Be's” to Success12 cited

Cited by

  • 2023The Ideal Review Process Is a Three-Way Street7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work