Quels positionnements pour quelle(s) géographie(s) critique(s) ?

Cécile Gintrac

6 citations0/0 files storedPresses universitaires de Rennes eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Historical Geography and Geographical Thought Spatial and Cultural Studies Geography and Education Methods

Abstract

La géographie critique ne peut pas ne pas penser la question du positionnement et de l’engagement. Si en sociologie, de nombreuses typologies de l’engagement ont été avancées (Burawoy, 2007), l’objectif n’est pas ici de fournir une telle classification pour la géographie, mais plutôt de répondre à quelques interrogations simples en apparence : la géographie radicale anglophone serait-elle plus « engagée » que les autres formes de géographie interrogeant les rapports de domination ? La radica...

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Can the Subaltern Speak?2005For Public Sociology 2005French Theory 2007Critical geography: anger and hope 2008Confessions of a Desk‐Bound Radical

Cited by

2019“Can these words, commonly applied to the Anglo‐Saxon social sciences, fit the French?” Circulation, Translation, and Reception of Radical Geography in the French Academic Context

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.