SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The increasing need for systematic reviews of prognosis studies: strategies to facilitate review production and improve quality of primary research
13 references·0 citing·41 second hop
The increasing need for systematic reviews of prognosis studies: strategies to facilitate review production and improve quality of primary research (2019)The increasing need for systematic review…A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies (2019)A guide to systematic review …PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the…A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes (2018)A framework for meta-analysis…A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance (2017)A guide to systematic review …Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement (2015)Transparent Reporting of a mu…Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)Transparent Reporting of a mu…Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)Critical Appraisal and Data E…Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors (2013)Assessing Bias in Studies of …Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic Reviews (2012)Search Filters for Finding Pr…Letter to the Editor (2007)Letter to the EditorDeveloping optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound prognostic studies in MEDLINE: an analytic survey (2004)Developing optimal search str…Developing optimal search strategies for detecting sound clinical prediction studies in MEDLINE. (2003)Developing optimal search str…Searching for Clinical Prediction Rules in MEDLINE (2001)Searching for Clinical Predic…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods (2024)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables (2001)Evaluation of the Quality of Prognosis Studies in Systematic Reviews (2006)Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models (2023)Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA) (2023)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement (2015)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE (1994)Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies in EMBASE. (2006)Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results (2007)Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE (2013)Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample (2005)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Evidence synthesis in prognosis research (2019)How to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic model studies (2022)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods (2025)Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)An efficient framework for conducting systematic literature reviews in agricultural sciences (2019)Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence (2021)Application of Standardized Regression Coefficient in Meta-Analysis (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration5,114 cited
  • 2013Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors3,273 cited
  • 2015Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement3,229 cited
  • 2018PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies2,953 cited
  • 2014Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist2,012 cited
  • 2019A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies753 cited
  • 2017A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance652 cited
  • 2012Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic Reviews349 cited
  • 2004Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound prognostic studies in MEDLINE: an analytic survey291 cited
  • 2018A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes278 cited
  • 2001Searching for Clinical Prediction Rules in MEDLINE184 cited
  • 2003Developing optimal search strategies for detecting sound clinical prediction studies in MEDLINE.102 cited
  • 2007Letter to the Editor70 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.