SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Selective outcome reporting in randomized clinical trials of dental implants
16 references·12 citing·50 second hop
Selective outcome reporting in randomized clinical trials of dental implants (2019)Selective outcome reporting in randomized…Outcome reporting bias in trials: a methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews (2018)Outcome reporting bias in tri…A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research (2018)A systematic review of compar…Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review (2017)Evidence of selective reporti…Clinical trial registration was not an indicator for low risk of bias (2017)Clinical trial registration w…What does research reproducibility mean? (2016)What does research reproducib…Outcome Discrepancies and Selective Reporting: Impacting the Leading Journals? (2015)Outcome Discrepancies and Sel…Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review (2015)Comparison of registered and …SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defini…Registration Rates, Adequacy of Registration, and a Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Surgery Journals (2013)Registration Rates, Adequacy …Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials of Surgical Interventions (2013)Comparison of Registered and …Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists (2011)Frequency and reasons for out…The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)The impact of outcome reporti…Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Comparison of Registered and …Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2004)Clinical Trial Registration: …Bias in Meta-Analysis Due to Outcome Variable Selection Within Studies (2000)Bias in Meta-Analysis Due to …Selective outcome reporting among randomized controlled trials published in leading dental journals: A research-on-research study (2024)Selective outcome reporting a…Nonpublication and Selective Outcome Reporting of Oral Health Trials (2023)Nonpublication and Selective …Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses (2023)Estimating the prevalence of …Spin and reporting in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in restorative dentistry (2022)Spin and reporting in systema…Selective outcome reporting in paediatric dentistry restorative treatment randomised clinical trials—A meta‐research (2022)Selective outcome reporting i…Selective outcome reporting bias is highly prevalent in randomized clinical trials of nonsurgical periodontal therapy (2022)Selective outcome reporting b…Trial registration and selective outcome reporting in Endodontic Research: Evidence over a 5‐year period (2021)Trial registration and select…Selective outcome reporting in root coverage randomized clinical trials (2021)Selective outcome reporting i…Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses (2021)Estimating the prevalence of …The level of evidence, scientific impact and social impact of clinical studies in periodontology: A methodological study (2020)The level of evidence, scient…Spin in the abstracts of randomized controlled trials in periodontology and oral implantology: A cross‐sectional analysis (2020)Spin in the abstracts of rand…Reference is not evidence (2020)Reference is not evidenceStatistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)A general parametric approach to the meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials (1991)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)Causal Variables, Indicator Variables and Measurement Scales: An Example from Quality of Life (2002)Effects of psychotherapy for anxiety in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review (2012)Psychological therapies for pathological and problem gambling (2012)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. (2011)The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)Exploratory Research (2020)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials (2014)Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews (2014)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established (2017)COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time (2019)Comparing dream to reality: an assessment of adherence of the first generation of preregistered studies (2021)Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility (2014)The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2016 update (2016)A solution to minimum sample size for regressions (2020)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Outcome choice and definition in systematic reviews leads to few eligible studies included in meta-analyses: a case study (2020)ROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis (2021)ROB-ME: a tool for assessing risk of bias due to missing evidence in systematic reviews with meta-analysis (2023)Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors' (2008)The Commodification of Academic Research (2010)Best Practice in Systematic Reviews: The Importance of Protocols and Registration (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials7,356 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2016What does research reproducibility mean?1,291 cited
  • 2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews1,133 cited
  • 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
  • 2004Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors264 cited
  • 2015Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review237 cited
  • 2011Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists220 cited
  • 2000Bias in Meta-Analysis Due to Outcome Variable Selection Within Studies194 cited
  • 2018Outcome reporting bias in trials: a methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews144 cited
  • 2013Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials of Surgical Interventions101 cited
  • 2013Registration Rates, Adequacy of Registration, and a Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Surgery Journals92 cited
  • 2015Outcome Discrepancies and Selective Reporting: Impacting the Leading Journals?80 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2018A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research70 cited
  • 2017Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review54 cited
  • 2017Clinical trial registration was not an indicator for low risk of bias49 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses33 cited
    • 2020Spin in the abstracts of randomized controlled trials in periodontology and oral implantology: A cross‐sectional analysis28 cited
    • 2021Selective outcome reporting in root coverage randomized clinical trials24 cited
    • 2021Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses18 cited
    • 2020The level of evidence, scientific impact and social impact of clinical studies in periodontology: A methodological study16 cited
    • 2021Trial registration and selective outcome reporting in Endodontic Research: Evidence over a 5‐year period15 cited
    • 2022Selective outcome reporting bias is highly prevalent in randomized clinical trials of nonsurgical periodontal therapy14 cited
    • 2022Selective outcome reporting in paediatric dentistry restorative treatment randomised clinical trials—A meta‐research13 cited
    • 2024Selective outcome reporting among randomized controlled trials published in leading dental journals: A research-on-research study10 cited
    • 2020Reference is not evidence7 cited
    • 2022Spin and reporting in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in restorative dentistry7 cited
    • 2023Nonpublication and Selective Outcome Reporting of Oral Health Trials7 cited