SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Careless Responding Threatens Factorial Analytic Results and Construct Validity of Personality Measure
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Careless Responding Threatens Factorial Analytic Results and Construct Validity of Personality Measure (2019)Careless Responding Threatens Factorial A…Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices (2018)Understanding the Model Size …Insufficient effort responding: Examining an insidious confound in survey data. (2014)Insufficient effort respondin…Reversed item bias: An integrative model. (2013)Reversed item bias: An integr…Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling: An Integration of the Best Features of Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (2013)Exploratory Structural Equati…Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research (2013)Caring about carelessness: Pa…When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. (2012)When can categorical variable…It takes two: Honesty–Humility and Agreeableness differentially predict active versus reactive cooperation (2012)It takes two: Honesty–Humilit…Identifying careless responses in survey data. (2012)Identifying careless response…Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys (2011)Detecting and Deterring Insuf…The HEXACO-60: A Short Measure of the Major Dimensions of Personality (2009)The HEXACO-60: A Short Measur…Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (2009)Exploratory Structural Equati…Sensitivity of Fit Indices to Model Misspecification and Model Types (2007)Sensitivity of Fit Indices to…Further assessment of the HEXACO Personality Inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form. (2006)Further assessment of the HEX…The Psychology of Survey Response (2000)The Psychology of Survey Resp…Attitudinal Ambivalence (2000)Attitudinal AmbivalenceA Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations (1995)A Review of Scale Development…Testing Structural Equation Models. (1995)The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. (1996)An Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Estimation for Confirmatory Factor Analysis With Ordinal Data. (2004)Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares (2015)Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. (2017)RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods (2018)Society and the Adolescent Self-Image (1965)Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model (1990)Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. (2003)Are Attention Check Questions a Threat to Scale Validity? (2017)Meaningfulness as Satisfaction of Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Beneficence: Comparing the Four Satisfactions and Positive Affect as Predictors of Meaning in Life (2017)Dealing with Careless Responding in Survey Data: Prevention, Identification, and Recommended Best Practices (2022)Modern factor analysis (1960)Structural Equations with Latent Variables (1989)Structural Equations with Latent Variables. (1991)The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models (2012)Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3) (2013)The structure of phenotypic personality traits. (1993)A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models (1999)The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy (2002)State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R (2014)The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality Factors (2014)Whole Trait Theory (2014)The Practice of Social Research (1989)What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. (1993)Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self‐Administered Surveys (2013)Best practice recommendations for data screening (2014)A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. (1960)Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study (2007)Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2008)Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data (2015)Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles (2017)Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2007)El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada (2014)A Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Framework for the Identification of Distinct Sources of Construct-Relevant Psychometric Multidimensionality (2015)An Updated Guideline for Assessing Discriminant Validity (2020)Construct validity in psychological tests. (1955)Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (1977)Review of Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). (1979)A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires (1998)Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques1 (2011)Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study (2011)Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit (1992)Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives (1999)lavaan : An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling (2012)Assessing Fit in Ordinal Factor Analysis Models: SRMR vs. RMSEA (2019)The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices (2019)Evaluating Model Fit of Measurement Models in Confirmatory Factor Analysis (2023)Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research (2006)Sensitive questions in surveys. (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000The Psychology of Survey Response4,727 cited
  • 2012Identifying careless responses in survey data.3,840 cited
  • 1995A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations3,192 cited
  • 2012When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.2,798 cited
  • 2009Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling2,676 cited
  • 2013Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling: An Integration of the Best Features of Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis1,807 cited
  • 2009The HEXACO-60: A Short Measure of the Major Dimensions of Personality1,709 cited
  • 2011Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys1,310 cited
  • 2018Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices937 cited
  • 2013Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research852 cited
  • 2007Sensitivity of Fit Indices to Model Misspecification and Model Types603 cited
  • 2014Insufficient effort responding: Examining an insidious confound in survey data.418 cited
  • 2013Reversed item bias: An integrative model.394 cited
  • 2006Further assessment of the HEXACO Personality Inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form.334 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2012It takes two: Honesty–Humility and Agreeableness differentially predict active versus reactive cooperation249 cited
  • 2000Attitudinal Ambivalence234 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.