SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality
16 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality (2019)Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes…Overview of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory for the Quantitative Assessment of Items in Developing Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures (2014)Overview of Classical Test Th…Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 2—Assessing Respondent Understanding (2011)Content Validity—Establishing…Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 1—Eliciting Concepts for a New PRO Instrument (2011)Content Validity—Establishing…Development and Distortion of Malaysian Public- Private Partnerships: Patronage, Privatised Profits and Pitfalls DOI: 10.1111/j.1467- 8500.2009.00655.x (2010)Development and Distortion of…Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Equivalence between Electronic and Paper-Based Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report (2008)Recommendations on Evidence N…What Is Sufficient Evidence for the Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures? (2007)What Is Sufficient Evidence f…Equivalence of Electronic and Paper-and-Pencil Administration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Meta-Analytic Review (2007)Equivalence of Electronic and…Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance (2006)Guidance for industry: patien…Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation (2005)Principles of Good Practice f…Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality (2005)Mode of questionnaire adminis…Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for Use in Japan (1998)Translation, Adaptation, and …Asking Sensitive Questions: The Impact of Data Collection Mode, Question Format, and Question Context (1996)Asking Sensitive Questions: T…Response Style and Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Rating Scales Among East Asian and North American Students (1995)Response Style and Cross-Cult…The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. (1992)The MOS 36-item short-form he…THE MOS 36- ITEM SHORT FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF- 36) CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION (1992)THE MOS 36- ITEM SHORT FORM H…Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation. (1992)Adapting the SERVQUAL scale t…Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. (1988)A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. (1999)Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys: The Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity (2008)National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet (2009)Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures (2000)Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: a clear and user‐friendly guideline (2010)Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health—a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force (2011)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity of the Japanese SF-36 Health Survey (1998)Estimating an EQ‐5D population value set: the case of Japan (2002)SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide (2003)The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Translation and validation study of the Iranian version (2005)Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. (1992)The Psychology of Survey Response (2000)Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method (2007)Face-to-Face versus Web Surveying in a High-Internet-Coverage Population: Differences in Response Quality (2008)Burnout–depression overlap: A review (2015)Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials II—An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force Report (2015)Fundamentals of item response theory (1992)Patient-reported outcomes: A new era in clinical research (2011)Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient‐reported outcome: The validation of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) (2016)COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study (2018)SERVQUAL revisited: a critical review of service quality (1996)Logistics Service Quality as a Segment-Customized Process (2001)Measuring Service Quality in E-Retailing (2006)Uncertainty, Threat, and the Role of the Media in Promoting the Dehumanization of Immigrants and Refugees (2013)How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies (2015)The PERMA-Profiler: A brief multidimensional measure of flourishing (2016)The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (1993)Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress (2002)A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder (2006)Coordinating Mechanisms in Care Provider Groups: Relational Coordination as a Mediator and Input Uncertainty as a Moderator of Performance Effects (2002)Essential elements of questionnaire design and development (2007)A Relational Model of How High-Performance Work Systems Work (2009)Development and Validation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairments (2010)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1992The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.33,714 cited
  • 2010Development and Distortion of Malaysian Public- Private Partnerships: Patronage, Privatised Profits and Pitfalls DOI: 10.1111/j.1467- 8500.2009.00655.x16,129 cited
  • 2005Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation5,518 cited
  • 2006Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance2,855 cited
  • 2005Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality1,872 cited
  • 1992THE MOS 36- ITEM SHORT FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF- 36) CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION1,575 cited
  • 1998Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for Use in Japan1,343 cited
  • 1996Asking Sensitive Questions: The Impact of Data Collection Mode, Question Format, and Question Context1,295 cited
  • 1992Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation.1,236 cited
  • 2011Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 2—Assessing Respondent Understanding1,133 cited
  • 2011Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 1—Eliciting Concepts for a New PRO Instrument

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,094 cited
  • 1995Response Style and Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Rating Scales Among East Asian and North American Students877 cited
  • 2007Equivalence of Electronic and Paper-and-Pencil Administration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Meta-Analytic Review623 cited
  • 2014Overview of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory for the Quantitative Assessment of Items in Developing Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures581 cited
  • 2007What Is Sufficient Evidence for the Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures?570 cited
  • 2008Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Equivalence between Electronic and Paper-Based Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report537 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.