Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Nuancing the discourse of underrepresentation: a feminist post-structural analysis of gender inequality in computer science education in the US

16 references·1 citing·28 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1991Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color29,736 cited
1991Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity29,379 cited
1980Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-197722,285 cited
1978Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.19,201 cited
2025The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers19,147 cited
2014Constructing grounded theory15,747 cited
2012The History of Sexuality: An Introduction5,375 cited
2011Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Second Edition3,025 cited
2007Discipline and Punish2,725 cited
2002Unlocking the clubhouse: women in computing1,958 cited
2009Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science.1,372 cited
2000Poststructural feminism in education: An overview737 cited
1982The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women?.725 cited
1999Working the Ruins: Feminist Poststructural Theory and Methods in Education645 cited
2015Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science.588 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2000

Theories of Gender in Organizations: A New Approach to Organizational Analysis and Change11We are grateful to Lotte Bailyn and our colleagues affiliated with the Center for Gender in Organizations, Simmons Graduate School of Management – Gill Coleman, Joyce Fletcher, Deborah Kolb, Deborah Merrill-Sands, Rhona Rapoport, and Bridgette Sheridan – for their contributions to these ideas and for their foundational research, on which this paper builds. We also appreciate the feedback we received on an earlier draft from members of the FSC Research Group, Elaine Backman, Herminia Ibarra, Maureen Scully, and Kathleen Valley. We thank Joanne Martin and Barbara Reskin for their comments, which helped in our conceptual framing of the paper. Finally, we thank Bob Sutton and Barry Staw for their helpful suggestions. This research was funded in part by the Ford Foundation.

560 cited

Cited by

2022Benefits and Difficulties of Gender Diversity on Software Development Teams: A Qualitative Study31 cited