SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Making Open Science Work for Science and Society
16 references·14 citing·39 second hop
Making Open Science Work for Science and Society (2019)Making Open Science Work for Science and …Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019)Model Cards for Model Reporti…Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions (2018)Radical open-access plan coul…Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission (2017)Ten simple rules to consider …Our path to better science in less time using open data science tools (2017)Our path to better science in…A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (2014)Routledge Handbook of Public …An Introduction to Social Media for Scientists (2013)An Introduction to Social Med…Golden Holocaust (2012)Golden HolocaustScience, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal (2009)Science, Policy, and the Valu…What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance? (2007)What happens when transparenc…Employing Philosophical Dialogue in Collaborative Science (2007)Employing Philosophical Dialo…Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? (2006)Transparency: The Key to Bett…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…The Fate of Knowledge (2002)The Fate of KnowledgeRetracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science (2024)Retracted articles in scienti…Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Access research (2024)Making science public: a revi…Achieving Global Open Access (2024)Achieving Global Open AccessMaking science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Science research (2023)Making science public: a revi…A precautionary approach to autonomous vehicles (2023)A precautionary approach to a…Open Science for Non-Specialists: Making Open Science Meaningful Beyond the Scientific Community (2022)Open Science for Non-Speciali…Las revistas científicas-académicas y el proceso editorial hacia la ciencia abierta en Uruguay (2022)Las revistas científicas-acad…As publicações científicas como fonte de renda econômica de editores comerciais: o acesso aberto solapado (2022)As publicações científicas co…The value-ladenness of transparency in science: Lessons from Lyme disease (2021)The value-ladenness of transp…The influence of opening up peer review on the citations of journal articles (2021)The influence of opening up p…Open Science: Open Data, Open Models, …and Open Publications? (2021)Open Science: Open Data, Open…A Framework for Analyzing Broadly Engaged Philosophy of Science (2021)A Framework for Analyzing Bro…A Taxonomy of Transparency in Science (2020)A Taxonomy of Transparency in…Science Journalism, Value Judgments, and the Open Science Movement (2019)Science Journalism, Value Jud…Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk (1988)Bad is Stronger than Good (2001)No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability (2009)Talking About Government (2011)Coping During Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature (2015)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities (1998)Human by Nature: Between Biology and the Social Sciences (1998)Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research (2004)Defining Terms for Integrated (Multi-Inter-Trans-Disciplinary) Sustainability Research (2011)Disciplining Interdisciplinarity: Integration and Implementation Sciences for Researching Complex Real-World Problems (2013)Creating and maintaining high‐performing collaborative research teams: the importance of diversity and interpersonal skills (2014)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The preregistration revolution (2018)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement (2015)Data Feminism (2020)A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning (2021)On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models (2021)Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals (2008)Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (2011)Teaching Scientific Practices: Meeting the Challenge of Change (2014)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)The New Statistics (2013)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories (2012)The Practical Relevance of Management Research: Turning the Debate on Relevance into a Rigorous Scientific Research Program (2015)Algorithmic bias: Senses, sources, solutions (2021)The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability (2007)The Effect of Transparency on Trust in Government: A Cross‐National Comparative Experiment (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
  • 2019Model Cards for Model Reporting2,653 cited
  • 2002The Fate of Knowledge1,621 cited
  • 2009Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal1,397 cited
  • 2006Transparency: The Key to Better Governance?903 cited
  • 2007What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance?573 cited
  • 2007Employing Philosophical Dialogue in Collaborative Science407 cited
  • 2013An Introduction to Social Media for Scientists404 cited
  • 2012Golden Holocaust317 cited
  • 2017Our path to better science in less time using open data science tools287 cited
  • 2014Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology270 cited
  • 2017Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission162 cited
  • 2018Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions155 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

  • 2020A Taxonomy of Transparency in Science76 cited
  • 2021Open Science: Open Data, Open Models, …and Open Publications?34 cited
  • 2022Open Science for Non-Specialists: Making Open Science Meaningful Beyond the Scientific Community32 cited
  • 2024Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science29 cited
  • 2021A Framework for Analyzing Broadly Engaged Philosophy of Science21 cited
  • 2019Science Journalism, Value Judgments, and the Open Science Movement21 cited
  • 2023A precautionary approach to autonomous vehicles20 cited
  • 2021The influence of opening up peer review on the citations of journal articles19 cited
  • 2022As publicações científicas como fonte de renda econômica de editores comerciais: o acesso aberto solapado17 cited
  • 2021The value-ladenness of transparency in science: Lessons from Lyme disease16 cited
  • 2024Achieving Global Open Access15 cited
  • 2022Las revistas científicas-académicas y el proceso editorial hacia la ciencia abierta en Uruguay15 cited
  • 2024Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Access research10 cited
  • 2023Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Science research8 cited