Citation map · Study

Evaluation of selective outcome reporting and trial registration practices among addiction clinical trials

16 references·2 citing·45 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
2014Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys4,513 cited
2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
2013A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples1,021 cited
2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
2017Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research514 cited
2016Internet, Phone, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Don A. Dillman, Jolene D. Smyth y Leah Melani Christian. (New Jersey, John Wiley and Sons, 2014)364 cited
2011Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials243 cited
2015Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review237 cited
2014Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials187 cited
2016A systematic review of trial registration and selective outcome reporting in psychotherapy randomized controlled trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by