SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Three Commonly Utilized Scholarly Databases and a Social Network Site Provide Different, But Related, Metrics of Pharmacy Faculty Publication
16 references·0 citing·40 second hop
Three Commonly Utilized Scholarly Databases and a Social Network Site Provide Different, But Related, Metrics of Pharmacy Faculty Publication (2020)Three Commonly Utilized Scholarly Databas…Two new kids on the block: How do Crossref and Dimensions compare with Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus and the Web of Science? (2019)Two new kids on the block: Ho…Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)Google Scholar to overshadow …Indicators as judgment devices: An empirical study of citizen bibliometrics in research evaluation (2017)Indicators as judgment device…Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articles (2017)Copyright compliance and infr…Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)Google Scholar, Scopus and th…The Number of Scholarly Documents on the Public Web (2014)The Number of Scholarly Docum…Alternative Perspectives on Impact: The Potential of ALMs and Altmetrics to Inform Funders about Research Impact (2014)Alternative Perspectives on I…Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: A case study of the h-index in nursing (2012)Coverage of Google Scholar, S…The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates (2011)The skewness of science in 21…The Hirsch index and related impact measures (2010)The Hirsch index and related …Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals (2009)Comparisons of Citations in W…A bibliometric analysis of pharmacology and pharmacy journals: Scopus versus Web of Science (2008)A bibliometric analysis of ph…Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis (2007)Google Scholar as a new sourc…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics (1969)Statistical bibliography or b…Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)Big Scholarly Data: A Survey (2017)Academic Influence Aware and Multidimensional Network Analysis for Research Collaboration Navigation Based on Scholarly Big Data (2018)A topography of climate change research (2020)Methods of Measuring the Concentration of Wealth (1905)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Living with the H-Index? Metric Assemblages in the Contemporary Academy (2012)An analysis of publication productivity for 1225 academic neurosurgeons and 99 departments in the United States (2013)How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations (2013)Cultural diversity in organizations : theory, research, and practice (1993)The End of Business Schools? Less Success Than Meets the Eye (2002)Design-Based Research (2012)Analyzing the Scientific Evolution of Social Work Using Science Mapping (2014)How Social Innovation ‘Came to Be’: Tracing the Evolution of a Contested Concept (2016)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)Gamification in Science Education. A Systematic Review of the Literature (2021)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? (2018)COVID-19 publications: Database coverage, citations, readers, tweets, news, Facebook walls, Reddit posts (2020)Comparative Analysis of the Bibliographic Data Sources Dimensions and Scopus: An Approach at the Country and Institutional Levels (2021)Consumers' willingness to pay for corporate social responsibility: Theory and evidence (2023)A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques (2017)Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases (2019)Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis (2020)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Toward a definition of “bibliometrics” (1987)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,030 cited
  • 1969Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics3,301 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories1,986 cited
  • 2015Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison1,783 cited
  • 2009Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals819 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases686 cited
  • 2007Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis676 cited
  • 2014The Number of Scholarly Documents on the Public Web321 cited
  • 2010The Hirsch index and related impact measures257 cited
  • 2019Two new kids on the block: How do Crossref and Dimensions compare with Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus and the Web of Science?164 cited
  • 2012Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: A case study of the h-index in nursing162 cited
  • 2011The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates156 cited
  • 2017Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articles147 cited
  • 2014Alternative Perspectives on Impact: The Potential of ALMs and Altmetrics to Inform Funders about Research Impact

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

126 cited
  • 2017Indicators as judgment devices: An empirical study of citizen bibliometrics in research evaluation123 cited
  • 2008A bibliometric analysis of pharmacology and pharmacy journals: Scopus versus Web of Science121 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.