SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Effect of Scientific Argumentation on the Development of Critical Thinking · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleEffect of Scientific Argumentation on the Development of Critical Thinking

Vetti Giri2020

Article2020

Effect of Scientific Argumentation on the Development of Critical Thinking

Vetti Giri · M U Paily

90 citations·0/0 files stored·Science & Education

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Education and Critical Thinking Development Science Education and Pedagogy Educational Strategies and Epistemologies

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 90 citations exist upstream.

References

2003The Uses of Argument 2013Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States 2008Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K-8 2000Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms 2004TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse 2002Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education 1996Young people's images of science 2000?Doing the lesson? or ?doing science?: Argument in high school genetics

Cited by

2023Effects of Inquiry-Based Approaches on Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Science: A Meta-Analysis 2021“Fake News” or Real Science? Critical Thinking to Assess Information on COVID-19 2021Exploring Students' Critical Thinking Skills Using the Engineering Design Process in a Physics Classroom 2021Developing Students' Skills of Identifying Reliable Scientific Sources: How to Avoid Fake Information

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2017A Critical Review of Scientific Argumentation in Science Educationarticle · 14 shared references 2013Nature of Science in the Science Curriculum: Origin, Development, Implications and Shifting Emphaseschapter · 13 shared references 2010On-line synchronous scientific argumentation learning: Nurturing students' argumentation ability and conceptual change in science contextarticle · 12 shared references 2012EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENGAGEMENT IN SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION AND CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGEarticle · 12 shared references 2017The pedagogy of argumentation in science education: science teachers’ instructional practicesarticle · 12 shared references 2013Explicit Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: An effect on student learning and transferarticle · 11 shared references

Details

Year2020

Typearticle

Published2020-05-02

VenueScience & Education

ISSN-L0926-7220

Languageen

Citations90

Files0 public / 0

ShelfEducation and Critical Thinking Development

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s11191-020-00120-y

openalex_workW3021022572

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.