SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The publication symmetry test: a simple editorial heuristic to combat publication bias
13 references·0 citing·48 second hopsampled
The publication symmetry test: a simple editorial heuristic to combat publication bias (2017)The publication symmetry test: a simple e…The need for reporting negative results – a 90 year update (2017)The need for reporting negati…Results Blind Science Publishing (2017)Results Blind Science Publish…Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology (2015)Replication, falsification, a…A tragedy of the (academic) commons: interpreting the replication crisis in psychology as a social dilemma for early-career researchers (2015)A tragedy of the (academic) c…Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer (2014)Publication bias in the socia…Commentary (2012)CommentaryPreregistration of Study Protocols Is Unlikely to Improve the Yield From Our Science, But Other Strategies Might (2010)Preregistration of Study Prot…Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Dissemination and publication…The Reversal Test: Eliminating Status Quo Bias in Applied Ethics (2006)The Reversal Test: Eliminatin…Journals Should Publish All “Null” Results and Should Sparingly Publish “Positive” Results (2006)Journals Should Publish All “…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The Existence of Publication …Social Dilemmas (1980)The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science (2012)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Scientific Utopia III: Crowdsourcing Science (2019)Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results. (2020)Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975)Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980)How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses (2018)Replication in Second Language Research: Narrative and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations for the Field (2018)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)Promoting an open research culture (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The preregistration revolution (2018)Publication Decisions and Their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance--Or Vice Versa (1959)Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. (1975)The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. (1982)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis (2007)Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough (1998)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science (2008)Excess Significance Bias in the Literature on Brain Volume Abnormalities (2011)Reproducibility in Science (2014)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Toward a positive theory of consumer choice (1980)On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative Therapies (1982)Status quo bias in decision making (1988)If and Then: A Critique of Speculative NanoEthics (2007)Status Quo Bias, Rationality, and Conservatism about Value (2015)The TESCREAL bundle: Eugenics and the promise of utopia through artificial general intelligence (2024)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Examining the interplay of affect and self regulation in the context of clinical reasoning (2019)Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2019)The role of prosocial behaviors in mate choice: A critical review of the literature (2019)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,571 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 2014Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer1,549 cited
  • 1990The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence1,413 cited
  • 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
  • 2015Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology472 cited
  • 2006The Reversal Test: Eliminating Status Quo Bias in Applied Ethics274 cited
  • 2015A tragedy of the (academic) commons: interpreting the replication crisis in psychology as a social dilemma for early-career researchers105 cited
  • 2006Journals Should Publish All “Null” Results and Should Sparingly Publish “Positive” Results62 cited
  • 2017Results Blind Science Publishing45 cited
  • 2012Commentary42 cited
  • 2010Preregistration of Study Protocols Is Unlikely to Improve the Yield From Our Science, But Other Strategies Might27 cited
  • 2017The need for reporting negative results – a 90 year update22 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work