A method called action(re)call. How and why we use it.

Pernilla Ahlstrand

6 citations0/0 files storedResearch in Drama Education The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Theatre and Performance Studies Arts and Performance Studies Creative Drama in Education

Abstract

The aim of this article is to describe an innovative method for investigating theatre knowledge at upper secondary school level. The results will function as an example of how the method called action (re)call can be used. The aim of working with the method, in collaboration with teachers and students, is to develop knowledge about ways of knowing in theatre education. The method represents a way to develop knowledge in relation to a complex, divergent assignment, in this case a stage production, and shows how didactic decisions can be planned in a systematic way.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

References

1985The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action 1984The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action 1997The Tacit Dimension 1959Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy 2000Action and embodiment within situated human interaction 1995Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice 1981Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers 1961Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.