SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluation of reproducible and transparent research practices in pulmonology
16 references·0 citing·38 second hop
Evaluation of reproducible and transparent research practices in pulmonology (2020)Evaluation of reproducible and transparen…Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Guidelines for reporting meta…What does research reproducibility mean? (2016)What does research reproducib…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Power failure: why small samp…The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)The secret lives of experimen…Scientific Utopia (2012)Scientific UtopiaBelieve it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)Believe it or not: how much c…Does mentoring matter: results from a survey of faculty mentees at a large health sciences university (2010)Does mentoring matter: result…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Comparison of Registered and …Selecting Studies and Collecting Data (2008)Selecting Studies and Collect…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Contradicted and Initially St…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Redefine statistical significance (2017)A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. (2018)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Sample Size Justification (2022)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)A power primer. (1992)Beyond Power Calculations (2014)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration10,571 cited
  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2011Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?1,885 cited
  • 2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research1,465 cited
  • 2012Scientific Utopia1,301 cited
  • 2016What does research reproducibility mean?1,291 cited
  • 2009Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials728 cited
  • 2017Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research514 cited
  • 2008Selecting Studies and Collecting Data

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

467 cited
  • 2012The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature457 cited
  • 2010Does mentoring matter: results from a survey of faculty mentees at a large health sciences university290 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.