Article2020

Debiasing as a powerful management accounting tool? Evidence from German firms

Niklas Kreilkamp · Maximilian Schmidt · Arnt Wöhrmann

15 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Accounting & Organizational Change

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Accounting and Organizational Management Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate if and how firms approach debiasing and what determines its success. In particular, this study examines if debiasing is effective in reducing cognitive decision biases. This paper also investigates organizational characteristics that determine the effectiveness of debiasing. Design/methodology/approach This study uses survey data from German firms to answer the research questions. Target respondents are individuals in a senior management accounting function. Findings In line with the hypotheses, this paper finds that debiasing can reduce cognitive biases. Moreover, this study finds that psychological safety not only directly influences the occurrence of cognitive biases but is also an important factor that determines the effectiveness of debiasing. Research limitations/implications This paper provides evidence that debiasing can serve as a powerful management accounting tool and discusses debiasing in the context of recent management accounting literature. This study also adds to the stream of research that investigates the role of psychological safety in organizations by highlighting its importance for successful debiasing. Practical implications This paper informs firms that use or intend to use debiasing about crucial determinants to consider when debating its implementation, i.e. psychological safety. This study also identifies risk management as a potential interface for the implementation of systematic debiasing. Originality/value While previous research primarily addresses specific cognitive biases and debiasing mechanisms using lab experiments, this is – to the best of the knowledge – the first study investigating cognitive biases and debiasing on a broad conceptual level using survey data.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 15 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.1974Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases 2018When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM 2011PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet 1954A Theory of Social Comparison Processes 1986Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects 1977Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys 1999Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams

Cited by

2021Packages of management control systems, entrepreneurial orientation and performance in Brazilian startups 2023Unlocking the sustainability of medium enterprises: A framework for reducing cognitive biases in sustainable performance management 2023Towards an integrated debiasing framework for consumer financial decisions: A reflection on debiasing research 2022How to de-bias investment judgements–unpacking bias and possible remedies in a capital investment context 2026Understanding public participatory budgeting behavior: how cognitive biases shape public budget preferences

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.